Archive for November 1st, 2009

Ron Paul excellent about the Iraq/Afghan quagmires & the coming war with Iran in the following youtube

Ron Paul was excellent about the Iraq/Afghan quagmires and the coming war with Iran in the following youtube:

Ron Paul vs. Michael Moore on Larry King CNN 10/29/2009

Ron Paul: Sanctions on Iran are an Act of War! (Foreign Affairs Committee Hearing)

“Matthew Hoh, a former marine captain who fought in Iraq and was posted to Afghanistan’s Zabul province where the Taliban is strong, questioned the purpose of the war and said that many Afghans were fighting only because foreign troops are in their country.”

First US official resigns in protest at Afghan war
U.S. official resigns over Afghan war

The bottom line (to the Afghan quagmire):


US-led war in Afghanistan ‘unwinnable’

Afghanistan: A War of Lies:

So one can clearly argue that 9/11 happened because of Israel and that the US invaded Afghanistan because of 9/11 and therefore because of Israel (look up ‘Israel as a terrorist’s motivation’ in Bamford’s ‘A Pretext for War’ book as the paperback version of ‘A Pretext for War’ includes an additional section about the AIPAC espionage case):



John Hibbs wrote:




Tony: Thanks for sending this link to the Bill Moyer’s video. It should be required viewing for every adult American. I have long contended that if the government sent an invoice to every taxpayer in the country, and had enforcement powers to collect, for his/her share of the actual out-of-pocket for the cost to conduct either the Afghan or the Iraq war, we would never have gone —- and sure as hell wouldn’t send more troops to in what many bright people on both sides of the political spectrum consider a hopeless cause (in Afghanistan).
Moyers reminds us about the monetary cost. But his really powerful message comes at the end.

For all those blind copied, please take four minutes to view Bill Moyers, —a fine, well respected journalist if ever there was one. Then, please forward


DEBORCHGRAVE Commentary: Bridges too far (in Afghan quagmire):



Ron Paul: Be Prepared for the Worst:

America, stop sucking up to Israel

General (Ret) James David wrote the intro to the following as he is mentioned on the cover of the third edition of former Republican Congressman Paul Findley’s ‘They Dare to Speak Out’ book about the power/influence of the pro-Israel lobby (AIPAC and similar) on the US political system and media:

General (Ret) James David wrote:

Wouldn’t it be nice if there was an american newspaper that would publish such an opinion?  When I say an american newspaper, I’m referring to a major newspaper like the Atlanta Journal-Constitution or the New York Times or USA TODAY.  I’m not referring to such as the American Free Press, or the Catholic Digest–we get them there .  We just never get them in the major newspapers.  Instead, the major newspapers have just the one side with the likes of Charles Krauthammer, George Will, Thomas Friedman, etc.  The only way we can get the other side is to go to Israeli newspapers as in this case.  The title of this article could be just as well as “American media, stop sucking up to Israel.”

America, stop sucking up to Israel

By Gideon Levy
HaaretzBarack Obama has been busy – offering the Jewish People blessings for Rosh Hashanah, and recording a flattering video for the President’s Conference in Jerusalem and another for Yitzhak Rabin’s memorial rally. Only Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah surpasses him in terms of sheer output of recorded remarks.In all the videos, Obama heaps sticky-sweet praise on Israel, even though he has spent nearly a year fruitlessly lobbying for Israel to be so kind as to do something, anything – even just a temporary freeze on settlement building – to advance the peace process.

The president’s Mideast envoy, George Mitchell, has also been busy, shuttling between a funeral (for IDF soldier Asaf Ramon, the son of Israel’s first astronaut Ilan Ramon) and a memorial (for Rabin, though it was postponed until next week due to rain), in order to find favor with Israelis. Polls have shown that Obama is increasingly unpopular here, with an approval rating of only 6 to 10 percent.

He decided to address Israelis by video, but a persuasive speech won’t persuade anyone to end the occupation. He simply should have told the Israeli people the truth. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who arrived here last night, will certainly express similar sentiments: “commitment to Israel’s security,” “strategic alliance,” “the need for peace,” and so on .

Before no other country on the planet does the United States kneel and plead like this. In other trouble spots, America takes a different tone. It bombs in Afghanistan, invades Iraq and threatens sanctions against Iran and North Korea. Did anyone in Washington consider begging Saddam Hussein to withdraw from occupied territory in Kuwait?

But Israel the occupier, the stubborn contrarian that continues to mock America and the world by building settlements and abusing the Palestinians, receives different treatment. Another massage to the national ego in one video, more embarrassing praise in another.

Now is the time to say to the United States: Enough flattery. If you don’t change the tone, nothing will change. As long as Israel feels the United States is in its pocket, and that America’s automatic veto will save it from condemnations and sanctions, that it will receive massive aid unconditionally, and that it can continue waging punitive, lethal campaigns without a word from Washington, killing, destroying and imprisoning without the world’s policeman making a sound, it will continue in its ways.

Illegal acts like the occupation and settlement expansion, and offensives that may have involved war crimes, as in Gaza, deserve a different approach. If America and the world had issued condemnations after Operation Summer Rains in 2006 – which left 400 Palestinians dead and severe infrastructure damage in the first major operation in Gaza since the disengagement – then Operation Cast Lead never would have been launched.

It is true that unlike all the world’s other troublemakers, Israel is viewed as a Western democracy, but Israel of 2009 is a country whose language is force. Anwar Sadat may have been the last leader to win our hearts with optimistic, hope-igniting speeches. If he were to visit Israel today, he would be jeered off the stage. The Syrian president pleads for peace and Israel callously dismisses him, the United States begs for a settlement free ze and Israel turns up its nose. This is what happens when there are no consequences for Israel’s inaction.

When Clinton returns to Washington, she should advocate a sharp policy change toward Israel. Israeli hearts can no longer be won with hope, promises of a better future or sweet talk, for this is no longer Israel’s language. For something to change, Israel must understand that perpetuating the status quo will exact a painful price.

Israel of 2009 is a spoiled country, arrogant and condescending, convinced that it deserves everything and that it has the power to make a fool of America and the world. The United States has engendered this situation, which endangers the entire Mideast and Israel itself. That is why there needs to be a turning point in the coming year – Washington needs to finally say no to Israel and the occupation. An unambiguous, presidential no.


Hey Congress Grow a Spine on Israel

U.S. Middle East policy motivated by pro-Israel lobby

What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn’t

Additional at following URL:

The Gorilla in the Room is US Support for Israel

Palestinians blast Clinton for Israel praise

Palestinians blast Clinton for Israel praise:

Netanyahu Scores Victory as US Abandons All Settlement Demands

Hey Congress Grow a Spine on Israel

(AIPAC hack) Clinton Makes Personal Bid to Resume Mideast Talks – ABC News


Ron Paul: Be Prepared for the Worst

Ron Paul: The worst is yet to come | Interview on KWN