Archive for December, 2009

Asking WHY is NOT “anti-Semitic” Ben Stein Plays the Anti-Semitism Card

Asking WHY is NOT “anti-Semitic” Ben Stein Plays the Anti-Semitism Card:

Ben Stein, Apologize to Ron Paul
Is Ron Paul Really An Anti-Semite or the only one with the balls to tell us the truth!?

 Ron Paul was spot on again as usual when he mentioned ‘occupation’ as the motivation for our terrorism problem, but it was totally out of line for Ben Stein to use the ‘anti-Semite’ trick when Ron Paul didn’t even mention Israel!:

See the video linked via the following URL:

The Trick:

Ron Paul “They’re Terrorist Because We’re Occupiers!”:  

Jerusalem Mayor: U.S. criticism won’t halt construction in city

General (Ret) James David (who wrote the following intro) is mentioned on the cover of  the third edition of former Republican Congressman Paul Findley’s ‘They Dare to Speak’ book about the power/influence of the pro-Israel lobby (AIPAC and similar) on the US political system and media:


Jerusalem Mayor: U.S. criticism won’t halt construction in city

Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:36 AM
From: General (Ret) James David

No, but I bet if there was a threat to cut off U.S. aid to Israel then we’d hear a different kind of response.  Sometimes I wonder if these actions taken by Israel are done intentionally just to anger Muslims into committing more terror that only helps Israel’s relations with America.  It also helps to justify Israel’s crimes against Palestinians.  Remember, on the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was: “It’s very good……. Well, it’s not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)” 

Last update – 20:15 30/12/2009
Jerusalem Mayor: U.S. criticism won’t halt construction in city
By Haaretz Staff
Tags: Israel news, Jerusalem 
Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat vowed Wednesday that criticism from the United States would not have any impact on construction in the city, Israel Radio reported.

Speaking during a tour of the neighborhood of Gilo, Barkat said that the demand to halt construction in Jerusalem only for Jews would not be legal anywhere in the world.

The White House made clear in a statement Tuesday that it opposes new Israeli construction in East Jerusalem, which is predominantly Arab and tapped by the Palestinians to be the capital of a future state.


“Neither party should engage in efforts or take actions that could unilaterally preempt, or appear to preempt, negotiations. Rather, both parties should return to negotiations without preconditions as soon as possible,” White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said in a statement.

Gibbs was referring to the plan to build 692 housing units in the Jewish neighborhoods of Neveh Yaakov, Har Homa and Pisgat Ze’ev in East Jerusalem.

But, according to a senior official in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s bureau, “everything was carried out with transparency vis-a-vis the Americans, even if there are disagreements.”

Israel announced several weeks ago that it was launching a 10-month suspension of construction in the West Bank, a move that was welcomed by the international community but also criticized as it failed to include East Jerusalem.

Terrorism Is a Cost of Empire

Terrorism Is a Cost of Empire

by Jacob G. Hornberger
Monday, December 28, 2009

To justify the federal government’s massive post-9/11 infringements on civil liberties, the proponents of Big Government have sometimes said, “There hasn’t been another major terrorist attack on the United States since 9/11. ”

I have responded with the following: “But if there had been another major terrorist attack, you Big Government advocates would be using that as a justification for even more severe infringements on civil liberties. So, either way you go, doesn’t Big Government win? ”

No one can deny that if the guy on that international flight to Detroit had succeeded in blowing up the plane, the Big Government advocates would be using that as an argument for having the federal government crack down even more on civil liberties.

And isn’t it interesting that the massive post-9/11 crackdown on civil liberties didn’t prevent the guy from apparently almost bringing down the plane. The fact that he failed doesn’t seem to have had anything to do with any security measures taken after 9/11. U.S. terrorism agents apparently even ignored or disregarded a personal warning from the guy’s father about his son’s extremist proclivities.

Even the anti-immigrant crowd is left empty-handed. It turns out that the guy apparently was entering the country legally, confirming what I’ve been saying ever since 9/11: That if people really want to keep out terrorists, they’ve got to put a total ban on foreign tourism to the United States. They’ve got to hermetically seal the United States, just like North Korea does.

Not surprisingly, the pro-empire crowd is using the incident to show why it is more urgent than ever to continue the brutal occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan and to expand killing the “bad guys” to Pakistan, Yemen, and who knows where else. The idea is that the government needs to keep killing those “bad guys” over there before they come here and kill us.

But as I’ve pointed out for years, the U.S. Empire has become the world’s biggest terrorist-producing machine. The more people it kills over there, the more the ranks of those who wish to retaliate against Americans are swelled.

In other words, the pro-empire advocates say, “We’re over there to kill them before they come over here and kill us. ” But what’s actually happening is this: They’re coming over here to kill us because the Empire is over there killing them.

What this is all about is the maintenance of the U.S. Empire — the “right” of the U.S. government to impose its will on countries around the world. Those regimes that cooperate receive U.S. taxpayer money. Those who refuse to cooperate receive bombs and missiles, or sanctions, embargoes, coups, assassinations, invasions, or occupations.

What the American people need to finally realize is that with Empire comes costs, including:

1. The meaningless deaths of U.S. soldiers. (No, they’re not dying to protect our rights and freedoms here at home but rather to maintain the hegemony of the Empire.)

2. The out-of-control federal spending that is sending our nation down the road to bankruptcy through debt, taxes, and inflation.

3. The constant threat of terrorist retaliation.

4. Ever-growing infringements on civil liberties.

The only way to avoid such costs is to dismantle the Empire, end the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, close all the overseas bases, and bring all the troops home and discharge them. There is no other way. Either keep the Empire and accept the costs, or restore a republic and get peace, prosperity, harmony, normalcy, and freedom.

Ron Paul “They’re Terrorist Because We’re Occupiers”

It is the foreign policy that needs to be addressed. See following URLs:  
Ben Stein, Apologize to Ron Paul

Asking Why is NOT “Anti-Semitic” Ben Stein plays the Anti-Semitism Card 

Ron Paul “They’re Terrorist Because We’re Occupiers!”: 
Ron Paul was spot on again as usual when he mentioned ‘occupation’ as the motivation for our terrorism problem, but it was totally out of line for Ben Stein to use the ‘anti-Semite’ trick when Ron Paul didn’t even mention Israel!:
See the video linked via the following URL:
The Trick:
Ben Stein was certainly thinking about Israel (also see the comments at the bottom of the following URL):
Ron Paul Moment (by Ben Stein):
Neo-Conservatives (Neo-Trotskyites) Call Ron Paul Supporters Locusts  
Bottom line to the Afghan quagmire:

The JINSA/PNAC/AEI Neocons pushed US into the Iraq quagmire which has added to our terror problem as well:

You might want to read Karen Kwiatkowski’s excellent review of Dr. Stephen Sniegoski’s ‘The Transparent Cabal’ book about the JINSA/PNAC/AEI Neocons who pushed US (via JINSA/PNAC/AEI associated Dick Cheney whose wife was a fellow up at AEI and still is to my info) into the Iraq quagmire in order to secure the realm for Israel in accordance with the ‘A Clean Break’ agenda (access the ‘A Clean Break’ link at the upper right of http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.COM if interested further):

Kwiatkowski Review of Transparent Cabal

Why no mention of the primary motivation for the tragic 9/11 attack (and the earlier attack on the WTC in 1993 – simply look up ‘Israel as a terrorist’s motivation’ in the index of James Bamford’s ‘A Pretext for War’ book) as conveyed via the following youtube video with over 440,000 views as it includes an exchange with Lee Hamilton of the 9/11 Commission?:

What Motivated the 9/11 Hijackers? See testimony most didn’t:

Take a look at the perspective of former CIA Bin Laden unit head Michael Scheuer who is a CBS News consultant/contributor as well (see what he mentioned via the following youtube videos)?:

Bill Maher interviews Michael Scheuer

“Sit Down!” The Power to Silence the Truth about 9/11 Part 2

US Support for Israel Gorilla in the Room (that even ’60 Minutes’ wouldn’t touch in Lara Logan’s latest AfPak segment which aired last Sunday!):

Ray McGovern: Shining Light on Roots of Terrorism

Israel factor mentioned in following CNN video:

Dare to Discuss Terrorists’ Motives & Support Representative Press!
Additional at following URL:
Former CIA Bin Laden unit head Michael Scheuer slams Israel lobby on C-SPAN

New York Times beats the drums for yet another war for Israel in the Middle East

Changing the Narrative for War
By Philip Giraldi

Same Song Different Verse (by Philip Giraldi)

Israel Rules

Israel Rules

US spies: Israel or UK forged nukes report on Iran

US spies: Israel or UK forged nukes report on Iran

Changing the Narrative for War
By Philip Giraldi

Same Song Different Verse (by Philip Giraldi)

U.S. Intelligence Found Iran Nuke Document Was Forged

Gareth Porter*

Inter Press Service
Thursday, December 31, 2009   3:07 GMT

WASHINGTON, 28 Dec (IPS) – U.S. intelligence has concluded that the document published recently by the Times of London, which purportedly describes an Iranian plan to do experiments on what the newspaper described as a “neutron initiator” for an atomic weapon, is a fabrication, according to a former Central Intelligence Agency official.

Philip Giraldi, who was a CIA counterterrorism official from 1976 to 1992, told IPS that intelligence sources say that the United States had nothing to do with forging the document, and that Israel is the primary suspect. The sources do not rule out a British role in the fabrication, however.

The Times of London story published Dec. 14 did not identify the source of the document. But it quoted “an Asian intelligence source” – a term some news media have used for Israeli intelligence officials – as confirming that his government believes Iran was working on a neutron initiator as recently as 2007.

The story of the purported Iranian document prompted a new round of expressions of U.S. and European support for tougher sanctions against Iran and reminders of Israel’s threats to attack Iranian nuclear programme targets if diplomacy fails.

U.S. news media reporting has left the impression that U.S. intelligence analysts have not made up their mind about the document’s authenticity, although it has been widely reported that they have now had a full year to assess the issue.

Giraldi’s intelligence sources did not reveal all the reasons that led analysts to conclude that the purported Iran document had been fabricated by a foreign intelligence agency. But their suspicions of fraud were prompted in part by the source of the story, according to Giraldi.

“The Rupert Murdoch chain has been used extensively to publish false intelligence from the Israelis and occasionally from the British government,” Giraldi said.

The Times is part of a Murdoch publishing empire that includes the Sunday Times, Fox News and the New York Post. All Murdoch-owned news media report on Iran with an aggressively pro-Israeli slant.

The document itself also had a number of red flags suggesting possible or likely fraud.

The subject of the two-page document which the Times published in English translation would be highly classified under any state’s security system. Yet there is no confidentiality marking on the document, as can be seen from the photograph of the Farsi-language original published by the Times.

The absence of security markings has been cited by the Iranian ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Ali Asghar Soltanieh, as evidence that the “alleged studies” documents, which were supposedly purloined from an alleged Iranian nuclear weapons-related programme early in this decade, are forgeries.

The document also lacks any information identifying either the issuing office or the intended recipients. The document refers cryptically to “the Centre”, “the Institute”, “the Committee”, and the “neutron group”.

The document’s extreme vagueness about the institutions does not appear to match the concreteness of the plans, which call for hiring eight individuals for different tasks for very specific numbers of hours for a four-year time frame.

Including security markings and such identifying information in a document increases the likelihood of errors that would give the fraud away.

The absence of any date on the document also conflicts with the specificity of much of the information. The Times reported that unidentified “foreign intelligence agencies” had dated the document to early 2007, but gave no reason for that judgment.

An obvious motive for suggesting the early 2007 date is that it would discredit the U.S. intelligence community’s November 2007 National Intelligence Estimate, which concluded that Iran had discontinued unidentified work on nuclear weapons and had not resumed it as of the time of the estimate.

Discrediting the NIE has been a major objective of the Israeli government for the past two years, and the British and French governments have supported the Israeli effort.

The biggest reason for suspecting that the document is a fraud is its obvious effort to suggest past Iranian experiments related to a neutron initiator. After proposing experiments on detecting pulsed neutrons, the document refers to “locations where such experiments used to be conducted”.

That reference plays to the widespread assumption, which has been embraced by the International Atomic Energy Agency, that Iran had carried out experiments with Polonium-210 in the late 1980s, indicating an interest in neutron initiators. The IAEA referred in reports from 2004 through 2007 to its belief that the experiment with Polonium-210 had potential relevance to making “a neutron initiator in some designs of nuclear weapons”.

The National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), the political arm of the terrorist organisation Mujahedeen-e Khalq, claimed in February 2005 that Iran’s research with Polonium-210 was continuing and that it was now close to producing a neutron initiator for a nuclear weapon.

Sanger and Broad were so convinced that the Polonium-210 experiments proved Iran’s interest in a neutron initiator that they referred in their story on the leaked document to both the IAEA reports on the experiments in the late 1980s and the claim by NCRI of continuing Iranian work on such a nuclear trigger.

What Sanger and Broad failed to report, however, is that the IAEA has acknowledged that it was mistaken in its earlier assessment that the Polonium-210 experiments were related to a neutron initiator.

After seeing the complete documentation on the original project, including complete copies of the reactor logbook for the entire period, the IAEA concluded in its Feb. 22, 2008 report that Iran’s explanations that the Polonium-210 project was fundamental research with the eventual aim of possible application to radio isotope batteries was “consistent with the Agency’s findings and with other information available to it”.

The IAEA report said the issue of Polonium-210 – and thus the earlier suspicion of an Iranian interest in using it as a neutron initiator for a nuclear weapon – was now considered “no longer outstanding”.

New York Times reporters David Sanger and William J. Broad reported U.S. intelligence officials as saying the intelligence analysts “have yet to authenticate the document”. Sanger and Broad explained the failure to do so, however, as a result of excessive caution left over from the CIA’s having failed to brand as a fabrication the document purporting to show an Iraqi effort to buy uranium in Niger.

The Washington Post’s Joby Warrick dismissed the possibility that the document might be found to be fraudulent. “There is no way to establish the authenticity or original source of the document…,” wrote Warrick.

But the line that the intelligence community had authenticated it evidently reflected the Barack Obama administration’s desire to avoid undercutting a story that supports its efforts to get Russian and Chinese support for tougher sanctions against Iran.

This is not the first time that Giraldi has been tipped off by his intelligence sources on forged documents. Giraldi identified the individual or office responsible for creating the two most notorious forged documents in recent U.S. intelligence history.

In 2005, Giraldi identified Michael Ledeen, the extreme right-wing former consultant to the National Security Council and the Pentagon, as an author of the fabricated letter purporting to show Iraqi interest in purchasing uranium from Niger. That letter was used by the George W. Bush administration to bolster its false case that Saddam Hussein had an active nuclear weapons programme.

Giraldi also identified officials in the “Office of Special Plans” who worked under Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith as having forged a letter purportedly written by Hussein’s intelligence director, Tahir Jalail Habbush al-Tikriti, to Hussein himself referring to an Iraqi intelligence operation to arrange for an unidentified shipment from Niger.

*Gareth Porter is an investigative historian and journalist specialising in U.S. national security policy. The paperback edition of his latest book, “Perils of Dominance: Imbalance of Power and the Road to War in Vietnam”, was published in 2006.

Kwiatkowski Review of Transparent Cabal

Kwiatkowski Review of Transparent Cabal

Sunday, December 27, 2009 5:13 PM
From: “Stephen Sniegoski”


 Hope you had a Merry Christmas and wishing you a  Happy New Year. 

Kwiatkowski Review of Transparent Cabal

The following  is a favorable review of my book, “The Transparent Cabal,” by Karen Kwiatkowski in “The Independent Review.”  Volume 14, Number 3, Winter 2010

Dr. Karen Kwiatkowski is well-known for writing about her personal experiences regarding the neocon-controlled  Office of Special Plans, the  Department of Defense office  which provided the most extreme war propaganda to drive the United States into the war on Iraq   She is a retired U.S. Air Force Lieutenant Colonel, with a background in intelligence,  whose assignments included duties in the  Pentagon and  the National Security Agency. While at NSA,  she  became a speechwriter for the agency’s director. After leaving the NSA in 1998, she became an analyst on sub-Saharan Africa policy for the Pentagon..

 From May 2002 to February 2003, the time of the propaganda buildup for the attack on Iraq,  Dr. Kwiatkowski served in the Pentagon’s Near East and South Asia directorate (NESA), where she gained first-hand knowledge of the activities of the Office of Special Plans. I made use of her first-hand information in my  section on the Office of Special Plans in “The Transparent Cabal.” 

Dr. Kwiatkowski  has a PhD in World Politics from The Catholic University of America; her thesis was on overt and covert war in Angola. She has also two published books about U.S. policy towards Africa.  She is a very courageous woman who dares to tell the truth and has been smeared for it by the neoconservatives and their fellow travelers.  

Dr. Kwiatkowski is currently  a teacher, lecturer, writer, and host of a radio program, “American Forum.”  The program’s archives are at:

I was on the second hour of her  June 1, 2009  program.

I am scheduled to be on her Monday, January 4, 2010 program at 6:00 pm EST. 

“Transparent Cabal” Website:

Amazon listing of “The Transparent Cabal”: 

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year,

Stephen  Sniegoski


The  Independent Review


pp. 445-449


The Transparent Cabal


The word cabal is derived from the Hebrew word Kabbalah, meaning “received doctrine.” Modern usage of cabal denotes a secretive group with mystical power and often insidious influence. For the past decade, in U.S.

foreign policy the word has been associated specifically with neoconservatism and in particular with a narrow group of pro-Israeli neoconservatives with occupations in government, think tanks, academia, and the news media.

A true cabal is opaque and mysterious, not transparent. Yet Stephen Sniegoski has aptly and refreshingly titled his latest book The Transparent Cabal (Norfolk, Va.:  Enigma Editions, 2008). The individuals who most convincingly articulated a need for war in Iraq and who strategized a U.S. mission to replace the Iraqi and other governments in the Middle East at gunpoint did not keep their vision veiled.  Instead, they loudly trumpeted, persistently drummed, and publicly paraded it in the offices, conferences, and reading rooms of the American political elite for many years. Sniegoski relies on publicly accessible material to introduce and support his thesis, which is that a close relationship exists between U.S. neoconservatives and the Israeli Likudnik right and that neoconservatives view U.S. foreign-policy interests through the lens of Israeli interests as perceived by the right-wing parties influential in Israel’s own democracy (pp. 3–7).

The idea that American neoconservatives have conflated U.S. security interests in the Middle East with the international-security perspective of ardent right-wingers in Israel has generated inflammatory and angry reactions from pro-Israel quarters in Washington. It is academically and politically a dangerous contemplation, as Sniegoski recognizes and as analysts of recent U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East know.

For the remainder go to:


 In-Depth Discussion: In Israel’s Interest – US Policy Influenced by Media and Neocon Agenda (call for friends Dr. Stephen Sniegoski and Lt. Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski included via the youtube linked at the following URL):

‘The Transparent Cabal’ mentioned in ‘The Independent’ (UK) newspaper

Carter further enraged many Jews by intimating that the pro-Israel lobby inhibited an evenhanded U.S. policy

Carter further enraged many Jews by intimating that the pro-Israel lobby inhibited an evenhanded U.S. policy

FBI Linguist Guilty of Leaking Classified Documents

December 18, 2009

FBI Linguist Guilty of Leaking Classified Documents

By Kim Zetter

 http://www.wired. com/threatlevel/ 2009/12/fbi- linguist/