Brzezinski: It’s Time for Obama to Channel His Hopes into Audacious Actions

Note what Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski so accurately conveys below with regard to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict being the primary motivation for the tragic 9/11 attack (and the earlier attack on the World Trade Center in 1993 as well) as such is also conveyed via the exchange with 9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton in the ‘What Motivated the 9/11 Hijackers? See testimony most didn’t’ youtube linked on the right at http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.COM and at http://REPRESENTATIVEPRESS.ORG as well

The Bottom Line (to the Afghan quagmire):

http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2009/10/bottom-line.html

 —————————————————-

Subject: January/February Pre-Release: Brzezinski: It’s Time for Obama to Channel His Hopes into Audacious Actions 

 

December 11, 2009

         
  Brzezinski: It’s Time for Obama to Channel His Hopes into Audacious Actions  

Biggest Tests are Middle East Peace, Iran, Afghanistan

In his first year as president, Barack Obama has “comprehensively reconceptualized U.S. foreign policy” and tried to “redefine the United States’ view of the world” observes former national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski. For his effort to turn a new page with the Muslim world, commitment to reducing the U.S. nuclear arsenal, treating China as a partner, and improving U.S.-Russia relations, among other things, Obama “did deserve the Nobel Peace Prize.”But so far, notes Brzezinski, Obama’s foreign policy “has generated more expectations than strategic breakthroughs”–in fact, the United States is already losing the renewed assurance of the Arab world and his “grand redefinition of U.S. foreign policy is vulnerable.” Obama must now turn to the three biggest challenges which will ultimately test his ability and his resolve to significantly change U.S. policy:

1. Israel-Palestine Peace Process:
“Paralysis over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has lasted far too long, and leaving it unresolved has pernicious consequences for the Palestinians, for the region, and for the United States, and it will eventually harm Israel. It is not fashionable to say this, but it is demonstrably true that–deservedly or not–much of the current hostility toward the United States in the Middle East and the Islamic world as a whole has been generated by the bloodshed and suffering produced by this prolonged conflict. Osama bin Laden’s self-serving justifications for 9/11 are a reminder that the United States itself is also a victim of the Israeli-Palestinian conundrum.”

2. Iran’s Nuclear Program
“Those advocating a tougher stance [on Iran] should remember that the United States would bear the brunt of the painful consequences in the event of an attack on Iran, whether the United States or Israel launched it. Iran would likely target U.S. forces in Afghanistan and Iraq, possibly destabilizing both countries; the Strait of Hormuz could become a blazing war zone; and Americans would again pay steep prices at the gas pump. Iran is an issue regarding which, above all, Obama must trust himself to lead and not to be led. So far, he has done so.”

3. War in Afghanistan
“Obama has moved toward abandoning some of the more ambitious, even ideological, objectives that defined the United States’ initial engagement in Afghanistan–the creation of a modern democracy, for example. But the United States must be very careful lest its engagement in Afghanistan and Pakistan, which still has primarily and most visibly a military dimension, comes to be viewed by the Afghans and the Pakistanis as yet another case of Western colonialism and elicits from them an increasingly militant response. Brzezinski, who has advised presidents since 1977, concludes that “the optimal moment for blending national aspirations with decisive leadership is when the personal authority of the president is at its highest–usually during the first year in office. For President Obama, alas, that first year has been dominated by the economic crisis and the struggle over health-care reform. The next three years may thus be more difficult. For the United States’ national interest, but also for humanity’s sake, that makes it truly vital for Obama to pursue with tenacious audacity the soaring hopes he unleashed.”

     
 
  Media Inquiries  
  Nadine Apelian, Media Relations, Foreign Affairs: 917.710.7432 or napelian@cfr.org   
     
  About Foreign Affairs  
  Published by the Council on Foreign Relations since 1922, Foreign Affairs is the leading publication on international affairs and U.S. foreign policy. The total paid circulation of Foreign Affairs has reached an all-time high of 161,000 per issue, a 43 percent rise since 2001. The premier business-to-business research firm Erdos & Morgan also ranks the magazine #1 in influence by U.S. opinion leaders in a national study of publications. Inevitably, articles published in Foreign Affairs shape the political dialogue for months and years to come.www.ForeignAffairs.com   
     

One Response to “Brzezinski: It’s Time for Obama to Channel His Hopes into Audacious Actions”

Leave a Reply