Archive for December 30th, 2009

Jerusalem Mayor: U.S. criticism won’t halt construction in city

General (Ret) James David (who wrote the following intro) is mentioned on the cover of  the third edition of former Republican Congressman Paul Findley’s ‘They Dare to Speak’ book about the power/influence of the pro-Israel lobby (AIPAC and similar) on the US political system and media:

 

Jerusalem Mayor: U.S. criticism won’t halt construction in city

Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:36 AM
From: General (Ret) James David
 

No, but I bet if there was a threat to cut off U.S. aid to Israel then we’d hear a different kind of response.  Sometimes I wonder if these actions taken by Israel are done intentionally just to anger Muslims into committing more terror that only helps Israel’s relations with America.  It also helps to justify Israel’s crimes against Palestinians.  Remember, on the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was: “It’s very good……. Well, it’s not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)” 

 
Last update – 20:15 30/12/2009
Jerusalem Mayor: U.S. criticism won’t halt construction in city
By Haaretz Staff
Tags: Israel news, Jerusalem 
 
 
 
Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat vowed Wednesday that criticism from the United States would not have any impact on construction in the city, Israel Radio reported.

Speaking during a tour of the neighborhood of Gilo, Barkat said that the demand to halt construction in Jerusalem only for Jews would not be legal anywhere in the world.

The White House made clear in a statement Tuesday that it opposes new Israeli construction in East Jerusalem, which is predominantly Arab and tapped by the Palestinians to be the capital of a future state.

Advertisement
 

“Neither party should engage in efforts or take actions that could unilaterally preempt, or appear to preempt, negotiations. Rather, both parties should return to negotiations without preconditions as soon as possible,” White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said in a statement.

Gibbs was referring to the plan to build 692 housing units in the Jewish neighborhoods of Neveh Yaakov, Har Homa and Pisgat Ze’ev in East Jerusalem.

But, according to a senior official in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s bureau, “everything was carried out with transparency vis-a-vis the Americans, even if there are disagreements.”

Israel announced several weeks ago that it was launching a 10-month suspension of construction in the West Bank, a move that was welcomed by the international community but also criticized as it failed to include East Jerusalem.

Terrorism Is a Cost of Empire

Terrorism Is a Cost of Empire

http://www.fff.org/blog/jghblog2009-12-28.asp

by Jacob G. Hornberger
Monday, December 28, 2009

To justify the federal government’s massive post-9/11 infringements on civil liberties, the proponents of Big Government have sometimes said, “There hasn’t been another major terrorist attack on the United States since 9/11. ”

I have responded with the following: “But if there had been another major terrorist attack, you Big Government advocates would be using that as a justification for even more severe infringements on civil liberties. So, either way you go, doesn’t Big Government win? ”

No one can deny that if the guy on that international flight to Detroit had succeeded in blowing up the plane, the Big Government advocates would be using that as an argument for having the federal government crack down even more on civil liberties.

And isn’t it interesting that the massive post-9/11 crackdown on civil liberties didn’t prevent the guy from apparently almost bringing down the plane. The fact that he failed doesn’t seem to have had anything to do with any security measures taken after 9/11. U.S. terrorism agents apparently even ignored or disregarded a personal warning from the guy’s father about his son’s extremist proclivities.

Even the anti-immigrant crowd is left empty-handed. It turns out that the guy apparently was entering the country legally, confirming what I’ve been saying ever since 9/11: That if people really want to keep out terrorists, they’ve got to put a total ban on foreign tourism to the United States. They’ve got to hermetically seal the United States, just like North Korea does.

Not surprisingly, the pro-empire crowd is using the incident to show why it is more urgent than ever to continue the brutal occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan and to expand killing the “bad guys” to Pakistan, Yemen, and who knows where else. The idea is that the government needs to keep killing those “bad guys” over there before they come here and kill us.

But as I’ve pointed out for years, the U.S. Empire has become the world’s biggest terrorist-producing machine. The more people it kills over there, the more the ranks of those who wish to retaliate against Americans are swelled.

In other words, the pro-empire advocates say, “We’re over there to kill them before they come over here and kill us. ” But what’s actually happening is this: They’re coming over here to kill us because the Empire is over there killing them.

What this is all about is the maintenance of the U.S. Empire — the “right” of the U.S. government to impose its will on countries around the world. Those regimes that cooperate receive U.S. taxpayer money. Those who refuse to cooperate receive bombs and missiles, or sanctions, embargoes, coups, assassinations, invasions, or occupations.

What the American people need to finally realize is that with Empire comes costs, including:

1. The meaningless deaths of U.S. soldiers. (No, they’re not dying to protect our rights and freedoms here at home but rather to maintain the hegemony of the Empire.)

2. The out-of-control federal spending that is sending our nation down the road to bankruptcy through debt, taxes, and inflation.

3. The constant threat of terrorist retaliation.

4. Ever-growing infringements on civil liberties.

The only way to avoid such costs is to dismantle the Empire, end the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, close all the overseas bases, and bring all the troops home and discharge them. There is no other way. Either keep the Empire and accept the costs, or restore a republic and get peace, prosperity, harmony, normalcy, and freedom.

http://www.fff.org/blog/jghblog2009-12-28.asp

Ron Paul “They’re Terrorist Because We’re Occupiers”

It is the foreign policy that needs to be addressed. See following URLs:  
 
 
Ben Stein, Apologize to Ron Paul
 
 
 
 

Asking Why is NOT “Anti-Semitic” Ben Stein plays the Anti-Semitism Card 
 
 

 
 
Ron Paul “They’re Terrorist Because We’re Occupiers!”: 
 
 
Ron Paul was spot on again as usual when he mentioned ‘occupation’ as the motivation for our terrorism problem, but it was totally out of line for Ben Stein to use the ‘anti-Semite’ trick when Ron Paul didn’t even mention Israel!:
See the video linked via the following URL:
 
The Trick:
 
 
 
Ben Stein was certainly thinking about Israel (also see the comments at the bottom of the following URL):
 
Ron Paul Moment (by Ben Stein):
 
 
 
 
Neo-Conservatives (Neo-Trotskyites) Call Ron Paul Supporters Locusts  
 
 
Bottom line to the Afghan quagmire:

http://tinyurl.com/yjwdlw6

The JINSA/PNAC/AEI Neocons pushed US into the Iraq quagmire which has added to our terror problem as well:

You might want to read Karen Kwiatkowski’s excellent review of Dr. Stephen Sniegoski’s ‘The Transparent Cabal’ book about the JINSA/PNAC/AEI Neocons who pushed US (via JINSA/PNAC/AEI associated Dick Cheney whose wife was a fellow up at AEI and still is to my info) into the Iraq quagmire in order to secure the realm for Israel in accordance with the ‘A Clean Break’ agenda (access the ‘A Clean Break’ link at the upper right of http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.COM if interested further):

Kwiatkowski Review of Transparent Cabal

http://america-hijacked.com/2009/12/27/kwiatkowski-review-of-transparent-cabal/

Why no mention of the primary motivation for the tragic 9/11 attack (and the earlier attack on the WTC in 1993 – simply look up ‘Israel as a terrorist’s motivation’ in the index of James Bamford’s ‘A Pretext for War’ book) as conveyed via the following youtube video with over 440,000 views as it includes an exchange with Lee Hamilton of the 9/11 Commission?:

What Motivated the 9/11 Hijackers? See testimony most didn’t:

http://tinyurl.com/5nlhs6

Take a look at the perspective of former CIA Bin Laden unit head Michael Scheuer who is a CBS News consultant/contributor as well (see what he mentioned via the following youtube videos)?:

Bill Maher interviews Michael Scheuer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZF4_oaTIH8g

“Sit Down!” The Power to Silence the Truth about 9/11 Part 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7EB1FxENxQ

US Support for Israel Gorilla in the Room (that even ’60 Minutes’ wouldn’t touch in Lara Logan’s latest AfPak segment which aired last Sunday!):

http://tinyurl.com/npvwbh

Ray McGovern: Shining Light on Roots of Terrorism

http://america-hijacked.com/2009/11/15/ray-mcgovern-shining-light-on-roots-of-terrorism/

Israel factor mentioned in following CNN video:   

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/world/2009/12/30/purefoy.nigeria.hometown.cnn?iref=allsearch

Dare to Discuss Terrorists’ Motives & Support Representative Press!
 
 
 
Additional at following URL:
 
Former CIA Bin Laden unit head Michael Scheuer slams Israel lobby on C-SPAN