Archive for January 16th, 2010
Brownfeld Review of Transparent Cabal
Saturday, January 16, 2010 8:50 AM
From: “Stephen Sniegoski”
The following is an excellent review of my book, The Transparent Cabal, by Allan C. Brownfeld. Allan C. Brownfeld is the author of five books, the latest of which is The Revolution Lobby (Council for Inter-American Security). He has been a staff aide to a U.S. Vice President, Members of Congress, and the U.S. Senate Internal Subcommittee.
He is editor of Issues of The American Council for Judaism, an associate editor of The Lincoln Review and a contributing editor to such publications as Human Events, The St. Croix Review, and The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.
A fuller biography can be found at:
Allen Brownfeld has also written a more extensive review of The Transparent Cabal, which will appear in the March issue of The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.
The Role of Neoconservatives – and Israel’s Right Wing – in the War in Iraq January 13,2010
By Allan C. Brownfeld
For many Americans, the reasons for the U.S. attack on Iraq in 2003 remains a mystery. The reasons the Bush administration gave for going to war – that Iraq had ties with al Qaeda, that it possessed weapons of mass destruction, and that, somehow, it was involved in the terrorist attacks of 9/ll – have all been proven false. It is, some argue, as if after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, we declared war on Mexico.
However, a group of men and women in and out of government proposed war with Iraq even before 9/ll. These were the neoconservatives – including such leading Bush administration officials as Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and L. Lewis “Scooter” Libby. What motivated these advocates of war with a country that never attacked the U.S. and posed little threat is the subject of an important new book, The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel (http://home.comcast.net/~transparentcabal) (Enigma Editions) by Stephen J. Sniegoski, Ph.D.
Dr. Sniegoski’s focus on the neoconservative involvement in American foreign policy antedates the 9/ll terrorist attacks. His first major work on the subject, The War on Iraq: Conceived in Israel (http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/conc_toc.htm) was published February l0, 2003 – more than a month before the American attack on Iraq.
The new book examines the close relationship of the American neoconservatives and the Israeli Likudnik right, and its role as a fundamental driver of the Bush administration’s militant Middle East policy. Sniegoski states, “This orientation is at the root of the explanation for why our policy does not seem to address or correspond with the genuine security needs of the U.S…. Ideology and personal ties have blinded them to what most others clearly see was the foreign policy reality.”
While U.S. policy traditionally stressed stability in the Middle East, “[T]he neocons called for destabilizing existing regimes…. Likudnik strategy saw the benefit of regional destabilization for its own sake – creating as it would an environment of weak, disunified states or statelets involved in internal and external conflicts that could easily be dominated by Israel…. Thus, unlike a true ‘cabal,’ characterized by secrecy, the neoconservatives’ was a ‘transparent cabal’ – oxymoronic as that term might be.”
Brownfeld’s review can also be found at:
Transparent Cabal Website:
Amazon listing of The Transparent Cabal:
Press TV interview with Dr. Stephen Sniegoski (Author of ‘The Transparent Cabal’):
Additional at following URL:
January 15th, 2010 | Author: Patriot | Edit
The Weird Factor
The panty bomber mystery deepens
Why is the American press silent on the Israeli role in NW Flight 253?
By Patrick Martin
16 January 2010
Nearly a week ago, on January 10, the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz carried a
news article by correspondent Yossi Melman pointing out the role of an
Israeli security firm, International Consultants on Targeted Security
(ICTS), in the failed attempt to detonate a bomb on board Northwest Airlines
ICTS subsidiaries I-SEC and PI are responsible for security screening of
passengers at Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport, where accused suicide bomber
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab boarded the Detroit-bound jet. The company uses
screening technology to profile passengers and identify security risks,
based on the experience of the Israeli intelligence services. Former El Al
Airlines and Shin Bet security personnel established ICTS in 1982 to market
their expertise, and many US airlines use their services or technology.
According to Ha’aretz, Abdulmutallab was screened by ICTS, but the security
agents failed to identify him as a threat, despite ample evidence.
“Even if US intelligence failed and the name of the Nigerian passenger was
not pinpointed as a suspect for the airline, he should have stirred the
suspicion of the security officers,” the newspaper wrote. “His age, name,
illogical travel route, high-priced ticket purchased at the last minute, his
boarding without luggage (only a carry on) and many other signs should have
been sufficient to alert the security officers and warrant further
examination of the suspect. However, the security supervisor representing
I-SEC and PI allowed him to get on the flight.”
The Israeli connection has been widely reported in the Israeli and European
press. In addition to Ha’aretz, the Jerusalem Post noted the role of ICTS in
Amsterdam in an article December 27, and Israeli television interviewed a
company director, who confirmed that Abdulmutallab had been given a security
Reports subsequently appeared in newspapers and Web news sources in Britain,
France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and Italy. But there has been
nothing in the main American media outlets-nothing in the New York Times,
the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal or any other major daily
newspaper, and nothing on any of the television or cable news networks.
The contrast between the press treatment in Europe and in America is an
indication that the role of ICTS is not merely an unimportant detail.
Clearly, the word is being passed to keep quiet on the subject, either in
the form of a direct order from the US security services, or indirectly
through the system of media self-censorship that operates no less
effectively for being “voluntary.”
What reason could there be to conceal the role of ICTS?
First, some relevant facts: ICTS handled security at the Charles de Gaulle
Airport outside Paris when “shoe bomber” Richard Reid boarded a US-bound
plane on December 22, 2001. The company also handled security for London’s
bus system during the July 7, 2005, suicide bomb attacks. And ICTS shared
security duties on September 11, 2001, at Boston’s Logan Airport, where two
of the four suicide hijackings originated.
At the very least, these are curious coincidences, particularly given the
supposed expertise of the Israeli security services in identifying and
forestalling terrorist attacks. ICTS has had its personnel on the scene in
four of the most notorious terrorist attacks of the past decade, and on each
occasion, they failed to take action to stop the terrorists.
In its 28 years of operation, ICTS has expanded to 22 countries, servicing
airports in France, Britain, Spain, Hungary, Romania and Russia, and
employing more than 11,000 security agents. It held contracts at several US
airports until after 9/11, when passenger screening was taken out of private
hands and assigned to the newly created federal Transportation Security
The silence on the role of ICTS is only the most curious aspect of a more
general shift by the media away from any reporting on the background to the
attempted bombing of Northwest Flight 253. There was a noticeable turn away
from an examination of the Christmas Day incident even before the Haitian
earthquake became-legitimately-the main focus of media attention.
The official story of Northwest Flight 253, as presented by the Obama White
House and the intelligence agencies, is so incredible that it seems there
has been a concerted effort to drop the subject and divert public attention
in other directions. In that context, the total silence on the role of the
Israeli security company raises even more questions about the role that US
and other intelligence agencies played in the period leading up to the
Christmas Day incident, which nearly cost the lives of some 300 people.