<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Obama Opt for War on Iran?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://america-hijacked.com/2010/02/07/will-obama-opt-for-war-on-iran/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://america-hijacked.com/2010/02/07/will-obama-opt-for-war-on-iran/</link>
	<description>Your Government is Hijacked by Zionism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:36:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tuhday, mate! &#171; Within This Shell</title>
		<link>http://america-hijacked.com/2010/02/07/will-obama-opt-for-war-on-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>tuhday, mate! &#171; Within This Shell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://america-hijacked.com/?p=3257#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>[...] ] [ Drockton - More 911 Truth: 911 Hijacker And MK-ULTRA ] [ How The Zionists Create Disasters ] [ Will Obama Opt For War On Iran? ] [ Israel &amp; The US Prepare For Iran - Part 1 - The Military Perspective ] [ WHO&#039;s Fake [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ] [ Drockton - More 911 Truth: 911 Hijacker And MK-ULTRA ] [ How The Zionists Create Disasters ] [ Will Obama Opt For War On Iran? ] [ Israel &amp; The US Prepare For Iran - Part 1 - The Military Perspective ] [ WHO&#39;s Fake [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreyWolf</title>
		<link>http://america-hijacked.com/2010/02/07/will-obama-opt-for-war-on-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-1167</link>
		<dc:creator>GreyWolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://america-hijacked.com/?p=3257#comment-1167</guid>
		<description>What can happen in Iran can easily be used against Americans back home.  It is something for all of us to fear &amp; stand against.

If ur interested in a new book just out then I recommend this one cause it&#039;s about a small town in American where the citizens stand up to federal tyranny &amp; ends up starting the 2nd American Revolution.  It&#039;s a powerful read for 2010 &amp; what each of us need to do to defend the constitution.  Maybe, history is now calling on all of us to find our destiny.
www.booksbyoliver.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can happen in Iran can easily be used against Americans back home.  It is something for all of us to fear &amp; stand against.</p>
<p>If ur interested in a new book just out then I recommend this one cause it&#8217;s about a small town in American where the citizens stand up to federal tyranny &amp; ends up starting the 2nd American Revolution.  It&#8217;s a powerful read for 2010 &amp; what each of us need to do to defend the constitution.  Maybe, history is now calling on all of us to find our destiny.<br />
<a href="http://www.booksbyoliver.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.booksbyoliver.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul L</title>
		<link>http://america-hijacked.com/2010/02/07/will-obama-opt-for-war-on-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://america-hijacked.com/?p=3257#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>One can only conclude from the madness of bombing yet another country into the stone age, this time Iran, that it is true, just as  Israeli prime-minster Sharon bragged  that we, meaning, &quot;Israel controls America&quot;. Congress is filled with &quot;Israel firsters&quot; and various other political whores willing to sell out America to enrich themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One can only conclude from the madness of bombing yet another country into the stone age, this time Iran, that it is true, just as  Israeli prime-minster Sharon bragged  that we, meaning, &#8220;Israel controls America&#8221;. Congress is filled with &#8220;Israel firsters&#8221; and various other political whores willing to sell out America to enrich themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WOLF</title>
		<link>http://america-hijacked.com/2010/02/07/will-obama-opt-for-war-on-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator>WOLF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://america-hijacked.com/?p=3257#comment-1160</guid>
		<description>Summary Of Obama Financial Regulation Plan
http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090617-712735.html
A summary of President Barack Obama&#039;s regulatory plan, &quot;Financial Regulatory Reform: A New Foundation.&quot; 

For the regulation of financial firms, the proposal: 
--Creates Financial Services Oversight Council, which would coordinate activities among regulators, replacing the President&#039;s Working Group. 
--Ensures that any financial firm big enough to pose a risk to the financial system would be heavily regulated by the Federal Reserve, including regular stress tests. 
--Gives the Fed oversight over parent companies and all subsidiaries, including unregulated units and those based overseas. 
--Says the Treasury will re-examine capital standards for banks and bank-holding companies. 
--Tells regulators to issue guidelines on executive compensation, with the goal of aligning pay with long-term shareholder value, including a re-examination of the utility of golden parachutes. 
--Creates a new bank agency, the National Bank Supervisor, and kills the Office of Thrift Supervision. The new agency will look over national banks, including federal branches and agencies of foreign banks. 
--Forces industrial banks, non-bank financial firms and credit-card banks to become more traditional bank holding companies subject to federal oversight. 
--Kills the SEC program that supervised Wall Street investment banks. 
--Requires hedge funds, private-equity funds and venture-capital funds to register with the SEC, allowing the agency to collect data from the firms. 
--Subjects hedge funds to new requirements in areas such as record keeping, disclosure and reporting. The oversight would include assets under management, borrowings, off-balance sheet exposures. 
--Urges the SEC to give directors of money-market mutual funds the power to suspend redemptions, and take other action to strengthen regulation of money-market mutual funds to prevent runs. 
--Beefs up oversight of insurance by creating an office within the Treasury to coordinate information and policy. 
--Kicks off a process by which the Treasury and the Department of Housing and Urban Development will figure out the future of mortgage giants Fannie Mae (FNM), Freddie Mac (FRE) and the federal home-loan banks. 
 
For the regulation of financial markets, the proposal: 
--Brings the markets for over-the-counter derivatives and asset-backed securities into a regulatory framework, strengthens regulation of derivatives dealers and forces trades to be executed through public counterparties, such as exchanges. 
--Toughens the regulatory regime, including more conservative capital requirements and tougher rules on counterparty credit exposure. 
--Strengthens laws designed to protect &quot;unsophisticated parties&quot; from trading derivatives &quot;inappropriately.&quot; 

--Gives the Fed more power over the infrastructure that governs these markets, such as payment and settlement systems. 
--Harmonizes the powers and authority of the SEC and CFTC to avoid conflicting rules relating to the same products. 
--Requires that originators, for example, mortgage brokers, should retain some economic interest in securitized products. 
--Directs regulators to &quot;align&quot; participants&#039; compensation with the long-term performance of underlying loans. 
--Urges the SEC to continue its efforts to improve the transparency and standardization of securitization markets and recommends the SEC have clear authority to require reporting from issuers of asset-back securities. 
--Urges the SEC to strengthen its regulation of credit-rating firms, including disclosing conflicts of interest, better differentiating between structured and unstructured debt and more clearly stating the risks of financial products. 
--Tells regulators to reduce their reliance on credit-rating firms. 
 
For regulations protecting consumers and investors, the proposal: 
--Creates a new agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Agency, with broad authority over consumer-oriented financial products, such as mortgages and credit cards. The new agency would work with state regulators. 
--Gives the new agency power to write rules and levy fines based on a wide range of existing statutes. 
--Proposes new authority for the Federal Trade Commission over the banking sector, in areas such as data security. 
--Gives the new agency authority to ban or restrict mandatory arbitration clauses. 
--Says the new regulator should have authority to define standards for simple &quot;plain vanilla&quot; products, such as mortgages, which would have to be offered &quot;prominently&quot; by companies. 
--Beefs up the agency&#039;s power to regulate unfair, deceptive or abusive practices. 
--Imposes &quot;duties of care&quot; that will have to be followed by financial intermediaries, such as stock brokers and financial advisers. 
--Regulates overdraft protection plans, treating them more like credit-card cash advances. 
--Strengthens SEC&#039;s framework for investor protection by expanding the agency&#039;s powers to beef up disclosures to investors, establish a fiduciary duty for broker-dealers who offer advice and expand protection for whistleblowers, including a fund that would pay for certain information. 
--Requires non-binding shareholder votes on executive compensation packages. 
 
To give the government more tools to manage crises, the proposal: 
--Creates a mechanism that allows the government to take over and unwind large, failing financial institutions. 
--Creates a formal process for deciding when to invoke this power, which could be initiated by the Treasury, Fed, FDIC or SEC. 
--Gives authority to make the final decision to the Treasury, with the backing of other regulators. 

--Gives the Treasury the authority to decide how to fix such a failing firm, whether through a conservatorship, receivership or some other method. 
--Taps the FDIC to act as conservator or receiver, except in the case of broker dealers or securities firms, in which case the SEC would take over. 
--Amends the Fed&#039;s emergency lending powers to require prior written approval by the Treasury Secretary. 
 
In the international sphere, the proposal: 
--Recommends international regulators strengthen their definition of regulatory capital to improve the quality, quantity, and international consistency of capital. 
--Recommends that various international bodies implement the Group of 20 recommendations, including requiring banks to hold more capital. 
--Urges that national authorities standardize oversight of credit derivatives and markets. 
--Urges other countries to follow the U.S. lead and: subject systemically significant companies to stricter oversight.

WOLF’s NOTE: In the public sector (citizens) this criminal government act embodies all the principals of Communism!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Summary Of Obama Financial Regulation Plan<br />
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090617-712735.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090617-712735.html</a><br />
A summary of President Barack Obama&#8217;s regulatory plan, &#8220;Financial Regulatory Reform: A New Foundation.&#8221; </p>
<p>For the regulation of financial firms, the proposal:<br />
&#8211;Creates Financial Services Oversight Council, which would coordinate activities among regulators, replacing the President&#8217;s Working Group.<br />
&#8211;Ensures that any financial firm big enough to pose a risk to the financial system would be heavily regulated by the Federal Reserve, including regular stress tests.<br />
&#8211;Gives the Fed oversight over parent companies and all subsidiaries, including unregulated units and those based overseas.<br />
&#8211;Says the Treasury will re-examine capital standards for banks and bank-holding companies.<br />
&#8211;Tells regulators to issue guidelines on executive compensation, with the goal of aligning pay with long-term shareholder value, including a re-examination of the utility of golden parachutes.<br />
&#8211;Creates a new bank agency, the National Bank Supervisor, and kills the Office of Thrift Supervision. The new agency will look over national banks, including federal branches and agencies of foreign banks.<br />
&#8211;Forces industrial banks, non-bank financial firms and credit-card banks to become more traditional bank holding companies subject to federal oversight.<br />
&#8211;Kills the SEC program that supervised Wall Street investment banks.<br />
&#8211;Requires hedge funds, private-equity funds and venture-capital funds to register with the SEC, allowing the agency to collect data from the firms.<br />
&#8211;Subjects hedge funds to new requirements in areas such as record keeping, disclosure and reporting. The oversight would include assets under management, borrowings, off-balance sheet exposures.<br />
&#8211;Urges the SEC to give directors of money-market mutual funds the power to suspend redemptions, and take other action to strengthen regulation of money-market mutual funds to prevent runs.<br />
&#8211;Beefs up oversight of insurance by creating an office within the Treasury to coordinate information and policy.<br />
&#8211;Kicks off a process by which the Treasury and the Department of Housing and Urban Development will figure out the future of mortgage giants Fannie Mae (FNM), Freddie Mac (FRE) and the federal home-loan banks. </p>
<p>For the regulation of financial markets, the proposal:<br />
&#8211;Brings the markets for over-the-counter derivatives and asset-backed securities into a regulatory framework, strengthens regulation of derivatives dealers and forces trades to be executed through public counterparties, such as exchanges.<br />
&#8211;Toughens the regulatory regime, including more conservative capital requirements and tougher rules on counterparty credit exposure.<br />
&#8211;Strengthens laws designed to protect &#8220;unsophisticated parties&#8221; from trading derivatives &#8220;inappropriately.&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8211;Gives the Fed more power over the infrastructure that governs these markets, such as payment and settlement systems.<br />
&#8211;Harmonizes the powers and authority of the SEC and CFTC to avoid conflicting rules relating to the same products.<br />
&#8211;Requires that originators, for example, mortgage brokers, should retain some economic interest in securitized products.<br />
&#8211;Directs regulators to &#8220;align&#8221; participants&#8217; compensation with the long-term performance of underlying loans.<br />
&#8211;Urges the SEC to continue its efforts to improve the transparency and standardization of securitization markets and recommends the SEC have clear authority to require reporting from issuers of asset-back securities.<br />
&#8211;Urges the SEC to strengthen its regulation of credit-rating firms, including disclosing conflicts of interest, better differentiating between structured and unstructured debt and more clearly stating the risks of financial products.<br />
&#8211;Tells regulators to reduce their reliance on credit-rating firms. </p>
<p>For regulations protecting consumers and investors, the proposal:<br />
&#8211;Creates a new agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Agency, with broad authority over consumer-oriented financial products, such as mortgages and credit cards. The new agency would work with state regulators.<br />
&#8211;Gives the new agency power to write rules and levy fines based on a wide range of existing statutes.<br />
&#8211;Proposes new authority for the Federal Trade Commission over the banking sector, in areas such as data security.<br />
&#8211;Gives the new agency authority to ban or restrict mandatory arbitration clauses.<br />
&#8211;Says the new regulator should have authority to define standards for simple &#8220;plain vanilla&#8221; products, such as mortgages, which would have to be offered &#8220;prominently&#8221; by companies.<br />
&#8211;Beefs up the agency&#8217;s power to regulate unfair, deceptive or abusive practices.<br />
&#8211;Imposes &#8220;duties of care&#8221; that will have to be followed by financial intermediaries, such as stock brokers and financial advisers.<br />
&#8211;Regulates overdraft protection plans, treating them more like credit-card cash advances.<br />
&#8211;Strengthens SEC&#8217;s framework for investor protection by expanding the agency&#8217;s powers to beef up disclosures to investors, establish a fiduciary duty for broker-dealers who offer advice and expand protection for whistleblowers, including a fund that would pay for certain information.<br />
&#8211;Requires non-binding shareholder votes on executive compensation packages. </p>
<p>To give the government more tools to manage crises, the proposal:<br />
&#8211;Creates a mechanism that allows the government to take over and unwind large, failing financial institutions.<br />
&#8211;Creates a formal process for deciding when to invoke this power, which could be initiated by the Treasury, Fed, FDIC or SEC.<br />
&#8211;Gives authority to make the final decision to the Treasury, with the backing of other regulators. </p>
<p>&#8211;Gives the Treasury the authority to decide how to fix such a failing firm, whether through a conservatorship, receivership or some other method.<br />
&#8211;Taps the FDIC to act as conservator or receiver, except in the case of broker dealers or securities firms, in which case the SEC would take over.<br />
&#8211;Amends the Fed&#8217;s emergency lending powers to require prior written approval by the Treasury Secretary. </p>
<p>In the international sphere, the proposal:<br />
&#8211;Recommends international regulators strengthen their definition of regulatory capital to improve the quality, quantity, and international consistency of capital.<br />
&#8211;Recommends that various international bodies implement the Group of 20 recommendations, including requiring banks to hold more capital.<br />
&#8211;Urges that national authorities standardize oversight of credit derivatives and markets.<br />
&#8211;Urges other countries to follow the U.S. lead and: subject systemically significant companies to stricter oversight.</p>
<p>WOLF’s NOTE: In the public sector (citizens) this criminal government act embodies all the principals of Communism!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WOLF</title>
		<link>http://america-hijacked.com/2010/02/07/will-obama-opt-for-war-on-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-1159</link>
		<dc:creator>WOLF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://america-hijacked.com/?p=3257#comment-1159</guid>
		<description>Totalitarian “Synchronization” — Germany 1933 and USA 2010 
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/47234.html 
The German National Socialists used the term Gleichschaltung to describe the “coordination” or “synchronization” of all government functions by centralizing power in the Chief Executive. This process was carried out through a series of executive decrees supposedly authorized by the 1933 Enabling Act, formally known as the “Law for Removing the Distress of People and Reich.”

The September 14, 2001 “Authorization for Use of Military Force” has served a similar function for both George W. Bush and Barack Obama. That measure has been invoked to justify the war in Iraq, the institutionalization of torture, the presidential designation of individuals as “unlawful enemy combatants,” the summary execution of suspected terrorists by means of unmanned Predator drones, and other tyrannical exercises of presidential “authority” in the context of the “war on terror.”

Yesterday (January 11), Barack Obama added another critical element to the architecture of wartime presidential dictatorship by signing an executive order establishing a “Council of Governors” for the supposed purpose of strengthening federal-state “partnership” in military and homeland security affairs.

The body would consist of a bipartisan panel of ten state governors who will “meet at the call” of various executive functionaries, including the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security to assist the Supreme Leader in carrying out the “synchronization” — again, what the Nazis called Gleichschaltung — “and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States.”

According to an official White House press release, this new body will be invaluable in the effort to “relieve the distress of the people and Reich.” No, not really; the statement actually said that the Council “will provide an invaluable Senior Administration forum for exchanging views with State and local officials on strengthening our National resilience and the homeland defense and civil support challenges facing our Nation today and in the future.” Which, come to think of it, is pretty much the same thing.

Taken by itself, this executive order does little more than add another layer of bureaucracy dealing with the use of the National Guard. It should be remembered, however, that in 2006 Congress turned the National Guard into something akin to a Praetorian Guard to be used — whether at home or abroad — as the president desires. This helps explain an obvious and ominous change in the Guard’s definition of its mission and responsibilities, which include hands-on involvement in domestic law enforcement.

It’s also worth pointing out that this new Council represents yet another avenue through which the president can circumvent congressional resistance to military adventurism, in the highly unlikely event that such resistance were to coalesce.

While it’s true that Obama’s executive order will not immediately result in troops flooding our cities and detention camps springing from the soil, it represents a critical milestone on the road to undisguised dictatorship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totalitarian “Synchronization” — Germany 1933 and USA 2010<br />
<a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/47234.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/47234.html</a><br />
The German National Socialists used the term Gleichschaltung to describe the “coordination” or “synchronization” of all government functions by centralizing power in the Chief Executive. This process was carried out through a series of executive decrees supposedly authorized by the 1933 Enabling Act, formally known as the “Law for Removing the Distress of People and Reich.”</p>
<p>The September 14, 2001 “Authorization for Use of Military Force” has served a similar function for both George W. Bush and Barack Obama. That measure has been invoked to justify the war in Iraq, the institutionalization of torture, the presidential designation of individuals as “unlawful enemy combatants,” the summary execution of suspected terrorists by means of unmanned Predator drones, and other tyrannical exercises of presidential “authority” in the context of the “war on terror.”</p>
<p>Yesterday (January 11), Barack Obama added another critical element to the architecture of wartime presidential dictatorship by signing an executive order establishing a “Council of Governors” for the supposed purpose of strengthening federal-state “partnership” in military and homeland security affairs.</p>
<p>The body would consist of a bipartisan panel of ten state governors who will “meet at the call” of various executive functionaries, including the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security to assist the Supreme Leader in carrying out the “synchronization” — again, what the Nazis called Gleichschaltung — “and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States.”</p>
<p>According to an official White House press release, this new body will be invaluable in the effort to “relieve the distress of the people and Reich.” No, not really; the statement actually said that the Council “will provide an invaluable Senior Administration forum for exchanging views with State and local officials on strengthening our National resilience and the homeland defense and civil support challenges facing our Nation today and in the future.” Which, come to think of it, is pretty much the same thing.</p>
<p>Taken by itself, this executive order does little more than add another layer of bureaucracy dealing with the use of the National Guard. It should be remembered, however, that in 2006 Congress turned the National Guard into something akin to a Praetorian Guard to be used — whether at home or abroad — as the president desires. This helps explain an obvious and ominous change in the Guard’s definition of its mission and responsibilities, which include hands-on involvement in domestic law enforcement.</p>
<p>It’s also worth pointing out that this new Council represents yet another avenue through which the president can circumvent congressional resistance to military adventurism, in the highly unlikely event that such resistance were to coalesce.</p>
<p>While it’s true that Obama’s executive order will not immediately result in troops flooding our cities and detention camps springing from the soil, it represents a critical milestone on the road to undisguised dictatorship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WOLF</title>
		<link>http://america-hijacked.com/2010/02/07/will-obama-opt-for-war-on-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-1158</link>
		<dc:creator>WOLF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://america-hijacked.com/?p=3257#comment-1158</guid>
		<description>Conspicuously obvious is the fact that Israel is blackmailing the USA with thermonuclear bombs already planted in several U.S. cities and that the &quot;evil Jew&quot; control every facet of his illegal government!

Obama Is A Jew
http://www.subvertednation.net/is-obama-jewish/  

Obama Is A Zionist Jew
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU0K9MWVqs0&amp;feature=related

Barack Obama is a ZIONIST ILLUMINATI part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dM7L4SDGdqU&amp;feature=related

Barack Obama is a ZIONIST ILLUMINATI part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ztgZkwhbDk&amp;feature=related

How the ILLUMINATI made Obama President 1/9
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oIQu7go0JU&amp;feature=related

How the ILLUMINATI made Obama President 2/9
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQBC-8FCmhQ&amp;feature=fvw

How the ILLUMINATI made Obama President 3/9
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OV00bB8JpX4&amp;feature=related

Antichrist Illuminati Obama New World Order Agenda 2012 Exposed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xld4P4nz5hA&amp;feature=related 

The Illuminati and the New World Order
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m89SB59DT34&amp;feature=related

Illuminati and New World Order
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkqfC9NX_DY&amp;feature=related

Obama&#039;s Jewish Grandfather
http://www.henrymakow.com/is_obama_literally_americas_fi.html 
(Baruch Obama&#039;s grandfather, Stanley &quot;Dunham&quot;) - Henry Makow, Ph.D. 


OBAMA PANDERS TO THE JEWS
http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=132 

JEWISH MONEY &amp; THE JEWISH MEDIA DECIDE who will be elected President. The latest patsy of the Jews is the Democratic candidate, Barack Obama. 

Here is what Obama told the Jews this past Monday, January 28 2008, in a conference call with Jewish journalists:

— “My strong commitment to the Jewish community should not be questioned.” —

— “Jewish Americans are hungry for broader changes in this country. I expect to do very well among Jewish voters because Jewish voters are concerned not only about issues specific to the Jewish community, but also with American domestic and international policy.” —

See: “Obama’s Call To The Jews” Here

WHAT OBAMA REALLY MEANS BY HIS “JEWISH” STATEMENTS

* “My commitment to the Jewish community should not be questioned.” 

Meaning: “I will bow before your wishes O Jews. If elected I will send billions of dollars to Israel to kill Palestinians.” 

* “Jewish Americans are hungry for broader changes in this country.”

Meaning: “I will continue to eradicate every form of public expression of Christianity in America. At the same time, I will allow you O Jews to come to the White House and light your Hanukkah Menorahs in the Oval Room or outside on the White House lawn. But I will never allow a Nativity Scene anywhere! 

* “Jewish voters are concerned not only about issues specific to the Jewish community, but also with American domestic and international policy.” 

Meaning: “I will appoint Jews as my advisors. I will place Jews in every possible sphere of political influence. Just send me your money O Jews and keep my ratings high in your media. 

“Thus we can work together to strengthen your control of domestic and foreign policy by promoting Gay Rights, Separation of Church &amp; State, and bombing every single one of your enemies!”

HOW DO WE STOP JEWISH CONTROL
OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS? 

Here are 3 options:

1. Never vote for a candidate that says, “I am deeply committed to Israel.”

2. Never vote for a candidate that the Jews support.

3. Never vote for a candidate that seeks to please 2% of the population (Jews) rather than pleasing the remaining 98% of us.

And pray to the Lord Jesus Christ that He would bring our nation out of the complete and total stranglehold that the Jews have on our nation’s political life! 

For More See: “Jews &amp; The 2008 Elections” Click Here

And: “Will Hillary Clinton Be The First Jewish President? ” Click Here

NOTE:
Harry Truman - Jew
Roosevelt - Jew
LBJ - Jew
Clinton ½ Jew
George H. Scherff, Jr., is GHWB Ashkenazi Jew
The idiot son GWB is Ashkenazi Jew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conspicuously obvious is the fact that Israel is blackmailing the USA with thermonuclear bombs already planted in several U.S. cities and that the &#8220;evil Jew&#8221; control every facet of his illegal government!</p>
<p>Obama Is A Jew<br />
<a href="http://www.subvertednation.net/is-obama-jewish/" rel="nofollow">http://www.subvertednation.net/is-obama-jewish/</a>  </p>
<p>Obama Is A Zionist Jew<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU0K9MWVqs0&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU0K9MWVqs0&amp;feature=related</a></p>
<p>Barack Obama is a ZIONIST ILLUMINATI part 1<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dM7L4SDGdqU&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dM7L4SDGdqU&amp;feature=related</a></p>
<p>Barack Obama is a ZIONIST ILLUMINATI part 2<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ztgZkwhbDk&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ztgZkwhbDk&amp;feature=related</a></p>
<p>How the ILLUMINATI made Obama President 1/9<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oIQu7go0JU&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oIQu7go0JU&amp;feature=related</a></p>
<p>How the ILLUMINATI made Obama President 2/9<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQBC-8FCmhQ&amp;feature=fvw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQBC-8FCmhQ&amp;feature=fvw</a></p>
<p>How the ILLUMINATI made Obama President 3/9<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OV00bB8JpX4&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OV00bB8JpX4&amp;feature=related</a></p>
<p>Antichrist Illuminati Obama New World Order Agenda 2012 Exposed<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xld4P4nz5hA&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xld4P4nz5hA&amp;feature=related</a> </p>
<p>The Illuminati and the New World Order<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m89SB59DT34&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m89SB59DT34&amp;feature=related</a></p>
<p>Illuminati and New World Order<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkqfC9NX_DY&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkqfC9NX_DY&amp;feature=related</a></p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s Jewish Grandfather<br />
<a href="http://www.henrymakow.com/is_obama_literally_americas_fi.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.henrymakow.com/is_obama_literally_americas_fi.html</a><br />
(Baruch Obama&#8217;s grandfather, Stanley &#8220;Dunham&#8221;) &#8211; Henry Makow, Ph.D. </p>
<p>OBAMA PANDERS TO THE JEWS<br />
<a href="http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=132" rel="nofollow">http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=132</a> </p>
<p>JEWISH MONEY &amp; THE JEWISH MEDIA DECIDE who will be elected President. The latest patsy of the Jews is the Democratic candidate, Barack Obama. </p>
<p>Here is what Obama told the Jews this past Monday, January 28 2008, in a conference call with Jewish journalists:</p>
<p>— “My strong commitment to the Jewish community should not be questioned.” —</p>
<p>— “Jewish Americans are hungry for broader changes in this country. I expect to do very well among Jewish voters because Jewish voters are concerned not only about issues specific to the Jewish community, but also with American domestic and international policy.” —</p>
<p>See: “Obama’s Call To The Jews” Here</p>
<p>WHAT OBAMA REALLY MEANS BY HIS “JEWISH” STATEMENTS</p>
<p>* “My commitment to the Jewish community should not be questioned.” </p>
<p>Meaning: “I will bow before your wishes O Jews. If elected I will send billions of dollars to Israel to kill Palestinians.” </p>
<p>* “Jewish Americans are hungry for broader changes in this country.”</p>
<p>Meaning: “I will continue to eradicate every form of public expression of Christianity in America. At the same time, I will allow you O Jews to come to the White House and light your Hanukkah Menorahs in the Oval Room or outside on the White House lawn. But I will never allow a Nativity Scene anywhere! </p>
<p>* “Jewish voters are concerned not only about issues specific to the Jewish community, but also with American domestic and international policy.” </p>
<p>Meaning: “I will appoint Jews as my advisors. I will place Jews in every possible sphere of political influence. Just send me your money O Jews and keep my ratings high in your media. </p>
<p>“Thus we can work together to strengthen your control of domestic and foreign policy by promoting Gay Rights, Separation of Church &amp; State, and bombing every single one of your enemies!”</p>
<p>HOW DO WE STOP JEWISH CONTROL<br />
OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS? </p>
<p>Here are 3 options:</p>
<p>1. Never vote for a candidate that says, “I am deeply committed to Israel.”</p>
<p>2. Never vote for a candidate that the Jews support.</p>
<p>3. Never vote for a candidate that seeks to please 2% of the population (Jews) rather than pleasing the remaining 98% of us.</p>
<p>And pray to the Lord Jesus Christ that He would bring our nation out of the complete and total stranglehold that the Jews have on our nation’s political life! </p>
<p>For More See: “Jews &amp; The 2008 Elections” Click Here</p>
<p>And: “Will Hillary Clinton Be The First Jewish President? ” Click Here</p>
<p>NOTE:<br />
Harry Truman &#8211; Jew<br />
Roosevelt &#8211; Jew<br />
LBJ &#8211; Jew<br />
Clinton ½ Jew<br />
George H. Scherff, Jr., is GHWB Ashkenazi Jew<br />
The idiot son GWB is Ashkenazi Jew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanette</title>
		<link>http://america-hijacked.com/2010/02/07/will-obama-opt-for-war-on-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-1156</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeanette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://america-hijacked.com/?p=3257#comment-1156</guid>
		<description>No, Barky will not opt for anything. Unless of course that&#039;s what his masters tell him to do. That fool doesn&#039;t have any real power of his own at all, he&#039;s just a silly little teleprompter reader with a to do list from the boss. If he did anything off-script he&#039;s be JFK&#039;d in short order. JFK was the last real president of the US and we all know how that ended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Barky will not opt for anything. Unless of course that&#8217;s what his masters tell him to do. That fool doesn&#8217;t have any real power of his own at all, he&#8217;s just a silly little teleprompter reader with a to do list from the boss. If he did anything off-script he&#8217;s be JFK&#8217;d in short order. JFK was the last real president of the US and we all know how that ended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://america-hijacked.com/2010/02/07/will-obama-opt-for-war-on-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-1155</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://america-hijacked.com/?p=3257#comment-1155</guid>
		<description>The &quot;demonized Ahmadinejad&quot; won his election by a landslide, in an election that was far more honest than the easily tampered electronic nonsense of the US.  The pre-election polls actually picked him to win by a larger margin than he did.  The fact that his opposition are the elitist college types and his supporters are the commoners speaks highly of Ahmadinejad.

The US has surrounded Iran militarily, is going to cut off their refined petroleum with sanctions and a naval blockade, and this will absolutely lead to a war.  The US seems to think that both Russia and China will back down while they attempt to turn Iran into Iraq, but that is unlikely.  There is also the threat of Iran dealing major death to US troops in Iraq, as the Iraqis would view them as liberators at this point.

This is absolutely a bad move for the US, particularly since the economy is in very dire straights.  The criminals in Congress, the Senate, and the Executive Branch should all be hung from trees and burned.  Their actions are going to eventually usher in a full scale nuclear war, and all they care about is their egos and bank accounts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;demonized Ahmadinejad&#8221; won his election by a landslide, in an election that was far more honest than the easily tampered electronic nonsense of the US.  The pre-election polls actually picked him to win by a larger margin than he did.  The fact that his opposition are the elitist college types and his supporters are the commoners speaks highly of Ahmadinejad.</p>
<p>The US has surrounded Iran militarily, is going to cut off their refined petroleum with sanctions and a naval blockade, and this will absolutely lead to a war.  The US seems to think that both Russia and China will back down while they attempt to turn Iran into Iraq, but that is unlikely.  There is also the threat of Iran dealing major death to US troops in Iraq, as the Iraqis would view them as liberators at this point.</p>
<p>This is absolutely a bad move for the US, particularly since the economy is in very dire straights.  The criminals in Congress, the Senate, and the Executive Branch should all be hung from trees and burned.  Their actions are going to eventually usher in a full scale nuclear war, and all they care about is their egos and bank accounts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patton</title>
		<link>http://america-hijacked.com/2010/02/07/will-obama-opt-for-war-on-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>Patton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://america-hijacked.com/?p=3257#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>Last week, it was Hillary spewing hate upon the world, with her obnoxious catalog of theoretical NATO-directives, as if &#039;security&#039; and &#039;partnership&#039; could EVER co-exist in, or could emanate from &#039;New&#039; America.

TODAY, I posed to a group of former &#039;peacenicks,&#039; now reduced to a sniffling rubble, just three simple questions:

In light of global concern for curtailing the power of the (sic) &#039;Israeli Lobby,&#039; do you believe we have too many Jews in postions of authority in Washington?  ..If so, are there any specfic Jews currently employed by this administration, who personally bother you by way of their overt support of foreign nations or financial powers?

And, since EVERYONE clearly observed the Bush administration&#039;s pattern of &#039;felonious complicity,&#039;  especially Pelosi&#039;s clear case of obstruction of justice; &quot;Impeachment is Off the Table!&quot; –Are there any specific Jews who you think really must be ousted from all positions of authority, as soon as possible?
_ _ _ _ _ 

*The real American Jews, (as most of you probably know,) really aren&#039;t remotely interested in &#039;warmongering,&#039; like Nancy and Hillary, et. all. As a rule, Jewish folks are among the greatest contributors to our relatively progressive (and previously hugely prosperous) culture. The problem really is caused by &#039;foreign financial elites.&#039;  And I believe they are playing their (sic) Israeli citizens, like a fiddle. Ultimately seeing it (Palestine) as &#039;little Miami,&#039; or &#039;Chernobyl,&#039; whichever comes first.  -For the record: Over a 30 year career 90% of my income has come from remarkably hip Jewish clients. Shame awaits anyone will ever attempt to label me &#039;anti-Jewish.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, it was Hillary spewing hate upon the world, with her obnoxious catalog of theoretical NATO-directives, as if &#8216;security&#8217; and &#8216;partnership&#8217; could EVER co-exist in, or could emanate from &#8216;New&#8217; America.</p>
<p>TODAY, I posed to a group of former &#8216;peacenicks,&#8217; now reduced to a sniffling rubble, just three simple questions:</p>
<p>In light of global concern for curtailing the power of the (sic) &#8216;Israeli Lobby,&#8217; do you believe we have too many Jews in postions of authority in Washington?  ..If so, are there any specfic Jews currently employed by this administration, who personally bother you by way of their overt support of foreign nations or financial powers?</p>
<p>And, since EVERYONE clearly observed the Bush administration&#8217;s pattern of &#8216;felonious complicity,&#8217;  especially Pelosi&#8217;s clear case of obstruction of justice; &#8220;Impeachment is Off the Table!&#8221; –Are there any specific Jews who you think really must be ousted from all positions of authority, as soon as possible?<br />
_ _ _ _ _ </p>
<p>*The real American Jews, (as most of you probably know,) really aren&#8217;t remotely interested in &#8216;warmongering,&#8217; like Nancy and Hillary, et. all. As a rule, Jewish folks are among the greatest contributors to our relatively progressive (and previously hugely prosperous) culture. The problem really is caused by &#8216;foreign financial elites.&#8217;  And I believe they are playing their (sic) Israeli citizens, like a fiddle. Ultimately seeing it (Palestine) as &#8216;little Miami,&#8217; or &#8216;Chernobyl,&#8217; whichever comes first.  -For the record: Over a 30 year career 90% of my income has come from remarkably hip Jewish clients. Shame awaits anyone will ever attempt to label me &#8216;anti-Jewish.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patton</title>
		<link>http://america-hijacked.com/2010/02/07/will-obama-opt-for-war-on-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-1153</link>
		<dc:creator>Patton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://america-hijacked.com/?p=3257#comment-1153</guid>
		<description>&quot;War is a racket for the corporations.&quot;

General Smedly Butler. Twice awarded the CMH.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;War is a racket for the corporations.&#8221;</p>
<p>General Smedly Butler. Twice awarded the CMH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
