AIPAC lackey Hillary Clinton still pushing sanctions against Iran for Israel

AIPAC lackey Hillary Clinton still pushing sanctions against Iran for Israel

Saudi FM al-Faisal doubts Iran sanctions plans

Saudi doubts over Iran sanctions
Imposing more sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme would not be a quick enough solution, Saudi Arabia’s foreign minister has said.

Prince Saud al-Faisal said the threat posed by Iran demanded a “more immediate solution” than sanctions.

He spoke in Riyadh alongside US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who earlier said Iran was “becoming a military dictatorship”.

On Tuesday Turkey’s foreign minister is due in Iran aiming to mediate.

Turkey is a Nato member, and Ahmet Davutoglu is expected to try and promote a deal on Tehran’s nuclear programme between Turkey’s western allies and Iran’s Islamic government.

More sanctions?

Speaking at a joint Riyadh news conference with Mrs Clinton, Prince Saud said: “Sanctions are a long-term solution. They may work, we can’t judge.

“ We don’t want to be engaging while they are building their bomb ”
Hillary Clinton US Secretary of State

“But we see the issue in the shorter term maybe because we are closer to the threat… So we need an immediate resolution rather than a gradual resolution.”

While the Saudi minister did not detail his vision of a quick solution in public, it is likely that options were discussed behind closed doors in the meeting between Mrs Clinton and King Abdullah, says the BBC’s Kim Ghattas, who is travelling with the top US diplomat.

Earlier, aides to Mrs Clinton – who is on a tour of the Gulf to try to build support for more sanctions on Iran – revealed she would press Saudi Arabia to help persuade China to support a tougher stand against Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

China, which can wield a veto on the UN Security Council as a permanent member, is against imposing more sanctions.

Beijing fears a major loss of revenue from investments in Iran, and disruption of oil supplies from a country providing it with 400,000 barrels a day, our correspondent says.

The Saudi foreign minister said that China, also a top importer of Saudi oil, did not need to be prodded by the kingdom to know what it ought to do about sanctions against Iran.

He added that efforts to rid the Middle East of nuclear weapons must also apply to Israel.


Speaking to students at a Qatar university earlier on Monday, she said Iran’s elite army corps, the Revolutionary Guard, had gained so much power they had effectively supplanted the government.

“We see that the government of Iran, the supreme leader, the president, the parliament, is being supplanted and that Iran is moving toward a military dictatorship. That is our view,” Mrs Clinton said on her maiden visit to the kingdom.

On Sunday, she urged Iran to reconsider its “dangerous policy decisions”.

Mrs Clinton told a conference in Qatar it was leaving the international community little choice but to impose further sanctions.

The US and its allies fear Iran is attempting to develop a nuclear weapon. Iran insists its nuclear programme is entirely peaceful.

Turkish mediation

Turkey has already offered to store Iran’s nuclear material as part of a swap arrangement agreed last year.

Under terms of that deal, Iran would get medical isotopes from France in return for handing over its own enriched uranium.

Turkey’s government hopes its offer to act as a nuclear repository will appeal more to Iran than storing its uranium elsewhere, says the BBC’s Jonathan Head in Istanbul.

But Iran is still insisting that any nuclear swap must take place on its own soil.

If no deal can be done with Iran, Turkey will soon be forced to choose its historically strong alliance with the US and Europe, and its desire for closer friendship with its eastern neighbour, our correspondent adds.

Iran, meanwhile, rejected criticism from the West about its human rights record.

“Iran is becoming one of the predominant democratic states in the region,” said Javad Larijani, secretary general of the Iranian High Council for Human Rights.


Iran moving toward military dictatorship, Clinton says

The secretary of State, speaking in Qatar, says sanctions against the Islamic Republic must be aimed at the Revolutionary Guard, which she warns is supplanting the government.
By Borzou Daragahi

February 16, 2010

Reporting from Beirut

Bluntly warning that Iran is sliding into military dictatorship, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton told an audience in Qatar on Monday that economic sanctions against the Islamic Republic should be increasingly aimed at its elite Revolutionary Guard.

Clinton, who was in Doha, the capital, for a conference on relations between the U.S. and the Islamic world, appeared to suggest that such a strategy could help rein in the ideologically motivated branch of the Iranian military by widening rifts within Iran’s domestic political establishment.”We are planning to try to bring the world community together in applying pressure to Iran through sanctions adopted by the United Nations that will be particularly aimed at those enterprises controlled by the Revolutionary Guard, which we believe is, in effect, supplanting the government of Iran,” she said during a visit with students at Carnegie Mellon University’s campus in Qatar, according to news agencies

“We see that the government of Iran, the supreme leader, the president, the parliament, is being supplanted and that Iran is moving toward a military dictatorship,” she said.

The Revolutionary Guard was created after Islamic clerics toppled the U.S.-backed monarch and took control of Iran during a 1979 revolution. Since that time, Iran’s government has been a blend of an authoritarian theocracy and a republic.

In recent years, though, members of the Guard have risen to positions of political and economic power, and have been accused by Iranian opposition figures of staging an electoral “coup d’etat” last year. If the Revolutionary Guard is taking control, it could require a different — and perhaps more drastic — response from Washington.

Clinton’s analysis of Iran’s political dynamics, which jibes with the latest assessments by Washington think tanks, suggests a U.S. attempt to use economic pressure to widen the divisions between hard-liners in the Guard and the rest of the Iranian political establishment, as well as with the opposition.

“The idea is to apply pressure on the Revolutionary Guard in order to force a wedge between the opposition movement and the guards, and to affect the guards’ decision-making on the nuclear program,” said Alireza Nader, an Iran analyst at the Rand Corp. “It might be an encouragement of the opposition movement in Iran, which also faces Revolutionary Guard repression.”

Even within the Guard, there are differences of opinion and priority. “There are some who are concerned about the economy and making money,” Nader said. “Sanctions might apply enough pressure on the guards to realize that the nuclear program is very costly.”

George Perkovitch, a proliferation expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said that some in the Guard might see the nuclear program as key to their own control of the government.

“This would be a big change, with a lot of implications that people will need time to think about,” he said. “There’s nothing good about it.”

An Iranian official dismissed America’s threat of further sanctions, saying that even if they were applied they would only help make Iran more self-sufficient.

“The international economic embargo that they always waved as a threat and applied against us is a failing policy,” Abolfazl Zohrevand, an advisor to Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, told Iran’s state-owned Arabic-language Al Alam news channel. “This threat might cause some complications, but we may also welcome it because it is a reason for our remarkable scientific progress.”

Iran has so far counted on Russia and China, which have U.N. Security Council veto power as well as strong economic and political ties to Tehran, to prevent the harshest sanctions advocated by the West from gaining the clout of international law.

U.S. government officials have imposed their own sanctions on individuals and organizations connected to the Guard, and are trying to enlist U.N. allies to add more levels of punishments. Clinton’s comments signal a move by the Obama administration to mobilize its allies as well as the Iranian opposition.

Clinton, in her visit to Doha, just across the Persian Gulf from Iran’s southern coast, acknowledged in a talk Sunday that relations had yet to improve between the U.S. and the Islamic world since President Obama’s speech to the Muslim world in Cairo last year. On Monday, she addressed the widespread view that prospects for a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians had dimmed, saying she was hopeful of a breakthrough.

But most of her attention during the visit was focused on Iran and its nuclear activities, which Tehran insists are focused solely on civilian purposes.

Though Clinton denied that the U.S. plans military action against Iran, she raised concerns about whether Tehran intends to build a nuclear bomb.

“The evidence is accumulating that that’s exactly what they are trying to do,” she said Sunday. She did not offer specifics.

After negotiations stalled between the West and Tehran over a possible deal to convert some of Iran’s nuclear material into fuel plates for a medical reactor, Iranian officials upped the ante last week by announcing they would produce their own, more-purified nuclear fuel in a step that would edge them closer to weapons-grade uranium.

U.S. intelligence agencies concluded in 2007 that Iran had ended work on a nuclear bomb by late 2003. But an upcoming U.S. National Intelligence Estimate might alter that assessment.

Clinton’s comments were broadcast on television from Qatar, which maintains robust diplomatic and economic ties with Iran.

“Iran has consistently failed to live up to its responsibilities,” she said Sunday. “It has refused to demonstrate to the international community that its nuclear program is entirely peaceful.”

U.S. State Department spokesman P. J. Crowley told Qatar’s Al Jazeera television that Iran’s actions fed Washington’s suspicions.

“Given the current trajectory that Iran is on — the fact that it still has centrifuges spinning and the fact that it is unwilling to constructively engage the international community — we have to assume that Iran is pursuing a nuclear program,” he told Al Jazeera.

After Tehran announced it would increase enrichment levels, U.S. officials and Western experts said Iran might be bluffing and that it lacked the technical prowess to efficiently produce the higher-grade uranium. A new International Atomic Energy Agency report detailing the latest technical and regulatory aspects of Iran’s nuclear program is due out this week.

Ali Akbar Salehi, chief of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, asserted Monday that it was within both Iran’s rights and know-how to produce higher-grade uranium. “We are authorized to enrich uranium up to 100% because we are a member of the IAEA. However, we respect our obligations. Those who cannot believe our ability to produce nuclear fuel will see its proof in the IAEA reports later.”

Times staff writer Paul Richter in Washington contributed to this report.

Published: 2010/02/16 01:37:17 GMT

3 Responses to “AIPAC lackey Hillary Clinton still pushing sanctions against Iran for Israel”

  • Patriot says:

    Dr. Stephen Sniegoski wrote:

    Secretary of State Clinton’s Concern About an Emerging Iranian Military Dictatorship

    The Voice of America writes: “U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Monday [Feb. 15] she hopes Iran’s mainstream leaders can recapture authority from the country’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps that she said threatens to take the country toward a military dictatorship.”

    However, for some years we have been told that the mainstream leaders—the “mullahcracy” and President Ahmadinejad–were evil and crazy enough to initiate nuclear war once Iran developed a nuclear weapon. We were told that a nuclear Iran could not be deterred because unlike the existing nuclear powers, the religiously fanatical mullahs and Ahmadinejad weren’t afraid of dying because they believed that blowing up infidels would get them into paradise.

    Why then would Secretary of State Clinton want this alleged group of genocidal maniacs to return to power? It does not seem that a “military dictatorship” could be any more dangerous. The war propaganda is becoming more confusing.

    Transparent Cabal Website:

    Amazon listing of The Transparent Cabal:

Leave a Reply