Obama Picks Kagan, Backer of Indefinite Detention Without Trial, for High Court

 

Obama Picks Kagan, Backer of Indefinite Detention Without Trial, for High Court

May 9, 2010 by legitgov

Breaking: President Barack Obama to pick U.S. Solicitor General Elena Kagan as U.S. Supreme Court nominee (CLG compilation) 09 May 2010 You know you’re in trouble when Faux (Fox) News is calling her ‘a brilliant woman.’

During her hearings to be confirmed as Solicitor General, the New York Times paraphrases Kagan as saying “that someone suspected of helping finance Al Qaeda should be subject to battlefield law — indefinite detention without a trial — even if he were captured in a place like the Philippines rather than a physical battle zone.” –Charlie Savage, Obama’s War on Terror May Resemble Bush’s in Some Areas, The New York Times, 17 Feb 2009. (Wikipedia)

Kagan to be Supreme Court nominee (CNN) 09 May 2010 President Obama will select Solicitor General Elena Kagan as the Supreme Court nominee to replace the retiring John Paul Stevens, a legal source close to the process told CNN Sunday evening. The nomination is expected to be announced Monday at 11 a.m. ET, another source familiar with the process said. Kagan, 50, a New York native, was widely reported to be the frontrunner for the nomination

——————————————————————————————-

 Kagan Argued to Ban Political Pamphlets

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/Kagan-Argued-Political-Pamphlets/2010/05/11/id/358676?s=al&promo_code=9DF0-1

Pat Buchanan: Suggests Too Many Jews on US Supreme Court Bench:

http://www.haaretz.com/news/international/pat-buchanan-suggests-too-many-jews-on-u-s-supreme-court-bench-1.290692

http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/05/pat-buchanan-there-are-too-many-jews-on-the-supreme-court.php?ref=fpb

Elena Kagan: Jewish Ethnic Networking Ease the Path of a Liberal/Leftist to the Supreme Court
 
 
 
Elena Kagan and the Supreme Court: A Barnyard Smell in Chicago, Harvard and Washington
 

15 Responses to “Obama Picks Kagan, Backer of Indefinite Detention Without Trial, for High Court”

  • spktruth says:

    Glenn Greenwald has been saying Kagan would take the court all the way right. This woman is a shoe in as the conservatives will pretend they are against her, while quietly applauding this choice. Diane Wood would have been someone who actually represented WE the people on the Court. He picked another corporate prostitute for corporate america, and puts three jews on the court. You gotta wonder what country is the Obama regime supporting, America or Israel.

  • R.D. Fuerle says:

    With a third of the Court now controlled by Jews, who are about 2% of the population, and almost all of the major financial, foreign policy, and domestic control positions in the Obama administration controlled by Jews, their takeover of America is moving rapidly towards completion. For those Americans who would like a glimpse of what awaits them, take a look at what happened during the Red Terror in Russia after the 1917 Revolution, in 1918 to 1922.

  • Paul-Carol Bradford says:

    eEEEK. HOW MUCH MORE CAN HAPPEN TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC?

    IS IT MORE ISRAELI FIRSTERS???? THIS IS DISGUSTING.

    WHAT ABOUT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND THEIR DIRE NEEDS?

    wE’RE ON YOUR SIDE, OBAMA, BUT WHAT IS THIS ALL ABOUT?

  • Quent says:

    Spktruth, look at the positive side! You will have loads of time to learn grammar while you are being held indefinitely without trial.

  • JohnZ says:

    This is the United States of israhell.
    Kagan will do whatever the jews tell her. She will no doubt back any form of anti gun legislation. I would seriously doubt her support for the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

  • Jim Barlucci says:

    Nothing new here for the discerning. Kagan is a Nazi posing as god knows what. She supports authoritarian presidential powers and restricted free speech. She also supports preventive detention for those committing terrorism (what a thin line that is, between lawful protest or, even, domestic violence for political gain and terrorism). This creature will be around for a long time, undermining our constitution as she redefines our political obligations as required submission to arbitrary political power. I wonder if Washington realizes how politically polarized this country is. Does possession of institutional authority alone presuppose compliance to the will of the oligarchy, or are there important lessons the Ivy League geeks need to learn? Just look around you; it’s not a Milton Bradley game you’ll see. But just try telling them that.

  • Jeff Ray says:

    Her being on golman sax’ payroll is enough to disqualify her in my book.

  • Mihail says:

    Jews Back Kagan For Supreme Court – Interview With Kevin MacDonald PhD
    DR KEVIN MACDONALD, PSYCHOLOGIST AND HISTORIAN, is a Professor of Psychology at the California State University.

    As the author of several books, Dr MacDonald outlines Jewry’s quest to destroy White Christian culture through intellectual movements and politics.

    Brother Nathanael Kapner: What was your initial reaction to Elena Kagan’s candidacy to the Supreme Court?

    Kevin MacDonald: The Jewish-owned media initially published a flurry of praises for Kagan’s candidacy. It was obvious to me that the theme of all of this is ethnic networking.

    How else explain the fact that someone with a completely undistinguished scholarly record not only got tenure at the University of Chicago but was appointed dean of Harvard Law School?

    Br Nathanael: What was the hype on Kagan and what indicated ethnic networking?

    Kevin MacDonald: The LA Times first published, “Supreme Court Candidate Elena Kagan Has Admirers Left And Right,” written by David Savage, a Jewish journalist. Although masquerading as news, the article is a brief for the candidacy of Elena Kagan.
    http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=494
    The Communist soul is the soul of Judaism. Hence it follows that, just as in the Russian revolution the triumph of Communism was the triumph of Judaism, so also in the triumph of fascism will triumph Judaism.”

    (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Rabbi Harry Waton, p. 143-144).
    The American Hebrew September 10, 1920:

    “The Bolshevist revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction, and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental and physical forces, become a reality all over the world.
    The Communists are against religion (Christianity), and they seek to destroy religion; yet, when we look deeper into the nature of Communism, we see that it is essential nothing else than a religion (Judaism).”

    (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Rabbi Harry Waton, p. 138).
    We have exterminated the property owners in Russia. We are going to do the same thing in Europe and America.”
    (The Jew, December 1925, Zinobit)
    Encyclopedia Americana (1985):
    “Khazar, an ancient Turkic speaking people who ruled a large and powerful state in the steppes North of the Caucasus Mountains from the 7th century to their demise in the mid 11th century A.D… In the 8th Century it’s political and religious head… as well as the greater part of the Khazar nobility, abandoned paganism and converted to Judaism… (The Khazars are believed to be the ancestors of most Russian and Eastern European Jews).
    Encyclopedia Britannica (15th edition):

    “Khazars, confederation of Turkic and Iranian tribes that established a major commercial empire in the second half of the 6th century, covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia… In the middle of the 8th century the ruling classes adopted Judaism as their religion.
    http://iamthewitness.com/doc/Ashkenazis.are.not.the.descendants.of.the.Ancient.Israelites.htm

  • Big M says:

    The SCOTUS is nothing but a gaggle of corporation lawyers. Any nation that would put up with a scenario where a bunch of robed quacks, unelected by anybody outside of DC and unaccountable to anybody outside of DC, with lifetime tenure guaranteed because Congress won’t lay a judicial glove on any of them because they rubber-stamp every criminal act out of the District of Criminals, has the last say in this criminal “justice” system, deserves whatever it gets.

  • James Petras writes:

    Elena Kagan joins a long list of key Obama appointees who have long-standing ties to the pro-Israel power configuration. Like Barack Obama, Elena Kagan started her legal apprenticeship with the Chicago Judge Abner Mitva, an ardent Zionist, who hailed the newly elected President Obama as “America’s first Jewish President”, probably his soundest judgment.

    The issue of the composition of the US Supreme Court is increasingly crucial for all Americans, who are horrified by Israel’s devastation of Gaza, its threats to launch a nuclear attack on Iran and its Fifth Column’s efforts to drag us into a third war in ten years. With the Presidents of the Major American Jewish Organizations pressing the compliant US Congress to declare “anti-Zionism” as a form of “anti-Semitism” and “opposition to Israel’s policies” as amounting to “support for terrorism”, thus criminalizing Americans critical of Israel, another active pro-Zionist advocate on the Court will provide a legal cover for the advance of Zionist-dictated authoritarianism over the American people.

    http://mycatbirdseat.com/2010/05/elena-kagan-and-the-supreme-court-a-barnyard-smell-in-chicago-harvard-and-washington/

  • peacelilly says:

    Heavens to Mergatroy! This is obscene. Religion seems to be the cause of so many wars, most of them completely unnecessary but brought on by the armchair warriors who collect from their investments in companies like Halliburton (heavily involved in the Gulf Wars and Dick Cheney) and others involved in the weapons and oil business. In the comfort of their offices, they draw up the plans, using publicized lies to hype people up to go to war by sneding the young to fight and die, for what? And propaganda that they hate freedoms? What had Iraq and Afghanistan to do with our freedoms? They don’t hate our freedoms, they hate being occupied – who wouldn’t? And nation building over there? Rebuilding what we destroyed? That’s crazy! Billions of dollars wasted. In Afghanistan, the mainstay of their economy are POPPY FIELDS! Our own nation needs rebuilding and jobs and crime fighting and illegal immigrant laws acknowledged and used. Meanwhile our government sends billions of dollars to the illegal occupier of Palestine by Israel, a rich nuclear armed country that is a threat to all its neighbors and to peace and security of the world. Subsidizing the genocide/holocaust of caged in people of Gaza, while polluting the Jordan River so it is down to a sesspool trinkle! All incumbents in the US government should be voted out the door ASAP. They are all on the dole of lobbies buying their votes and opinions and underming our democracy. Israel has refused to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty while threatening to bomb Iran for even thinking of nuclear power! They want to throw the Christians and Muslims into the sea (meaning out) and they are working on that every day! Illegally evicting people from homes, building apartheid walls. Most Jews live in the US, Germany, Russia, Australia, Iran and other countries! And for the record, Jews are not a race – they are mostly converts to Judaism – read Tel Aviv Prof. Shlomo Sands book “Inventing the Jewish people.” There was no Exodus – the very thing zionist Jews and CHristians base their tales on so Jews will flock to Palestine to die or submit to Jesus. Israelis laugh all the way to the bank on that one! You should too! And peace? The only peace Netanyahu wants is a piece of Lebanon, Syria, all of Iraq and all of Palestine, and a piece of Egypt. Meantime Mr. MoneyBags is the hapless US taxpayer plus and the Israeli lobbies of over 200 to which many zionist Christians pay into. And they get tax breaks for those contribution bribes!

  • Jeanne says:

    I had read that there was legislation before the House of Commons in Canada equating anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism and criticism of Israel as supporting terrorism. Petras now writes that there is movement to do the same in the US. This, of course, would come before the Supreme Court which has 3 Jewish judges (no Protestants who comprise over 50% of the US). Could anyone enlighten me on these attemps to limit freedom of speech to protect Israel.

  • j r says:

    “indefinite detention without a trial” Sounds like she will fit right in with the rest of the SCOTUS and the other two branches of government.

    Can we change the name of the country to the United States of Israel yet?

Leave a Reply