Executive Privilege

Executive Privilege


Posted By Philip Giraldi On June 30, 2010

The removal of General Stanley McChrystal from command provided President Barack Obama with the perfect opportunity to review the entire Afghan war strategy and declare it a failure.  That he did not do so means that the war now belongs fully to the president and he, in typical Washington fashion, will insist on something that he can describe as “mission accomplished.”  The fighting will continue until Washington runs out of money and soldiers and is forced to craft together a phony peace settlement before leaving with its tail between its legs.  The whole world knows that United States foreign policy has become little more than a pathetic joke, a fact that is also becoming increasingly clear to many Americans who do not live inside the Washington beltway bubble.

Even if the long war finally ends some day, there will be no revival of the liberties enshrined in the United States constitution and the protections afforded by the rule of law.  This will be the most enduring legacy of George W. Bush and Barack Obama.  It hasn’t mattered which party has been in power, the objective of both has been to establish an all powerful executive that can operate without any constitutional restraints.  Since 2001, the creation of just such a central authority, fueled by an exaggerated fear of terrorism, has led to the dismantling of many of the freedoms that Americans enjoyed for over two hundred years.

President Barack Obama promised more openness and accountability in government but he has not delivered.  He has failed to abolish or significantly amend the Patriot Acts and the Military Commissions Act, which together make it possible to detain anyone indefinitely based only on suspicion. Obama’s Justice Department has defended the government’s use of the state secrets privilege to avoid having to deal with pesky lawsuits from civil libertarians and whistle blowers.  The Obama White House is, as a result, just as secretive as that of his predecessor.  And all indications are that it will only get worse as the Supreme Court slides to the right on the issue of executive authority. 

New Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan has described retired Israeli Judge Aharon Barak as her “judicial hero.”  Barak is sometimes described as a liberal, but a review of his decisions reveals that he has always sided with the Israeli government in cases where arbitrary behavior by the state was being challenged.  He also established the legal guidelines that enabled torture by the Israeli authorities.  Kagan herself is of a like mind, favoring government prerogatives, executive privilege and secrecy even when there is no clear legal reason to deny access to information.  In one recent case Kagan successfully argued that the Supreme Court should overturn a New York appeals court ruling to permit the release of photographs of foreign prisoners being abused by their American captors. The American Civil Liberties Union argued for the release of the photos while Obama and the Pentagon against. Kagan, in her role as solicitor general, argued that US military personnel would be endangered if the photos were to become public.

In another case presented by Kagan on behalf of the Obama Administration, her soon-to-be colleagues on the court agreed with her argument and ruled that the government has a right to criminalize any and all contact with organizations that are defined as terrorists, even if that contact is undertaken with the intent to convince the groups to abandon the very activities that the US government condemns.  With that ruling, humanitarian assistance provided to civilians in an area controlled by a group that the White House considers to be terrorist-connected would become the indictable offense of terrorism support.  The explanation given by Chief Justice John Roberts was hardly illuminating.  He said those who oppose the law “simply disagree with the considered judgment of Congress and the executive that providing material support to a designated foreign terrorist organization — even seemingly benign support — bolsters the terrorist activities of that organization.”  In other words, the right of Americans to associate freely, guaranteed by the first amendment, can be limited by Congress and the White House if they disapprove of or criminalize the group you are associating with.  The Supreme Court is curiously siding with the executive and legislature and denying that it has any right to uphold the constitution, which becomes, by that standard, truly just a piece of paper.  The government can call anything a security threat and can proceed without restraint. Libertarians were dismayed by the ruling, but the Israel Lobby’s Anti Defamation League called the ruling “right on target.”

Kagan also supports the right of the United States to detain indefinitely anyone anywhere in the world if the White House determines that there is some actual or potential threat.  This is an expansion of the “whole world is a battle field” thinking that drove the zealots in the Bush Administration.  With Kagan on the court there will be virtually no resistance to any Administration action as long as it can be plausibly (or even implausibly) labeled as terrorism connected.

The unitary battlefield thinking inevitably spawned the kill them when you find them solution for dealing with the problem.  The United States is the only country in the world that has declared that it has the right – and the desire – to murder its own citizens overseas when there is suspicion that they are involved in any way with what it calls a terrorist group.  It also appears to believe that collateral damage is not an issue, so if a suspect is traveling in a car with his family, too bad for the family.  Suspicion is the only relevant standard for being placed on the death list, and the victim of the targeted assassination does not have to be in flagrante involved in an actual terrorist act.  The only due process in the killing would be rendered by a Washington bureaucrat presumably being advised by a Justice Department lawyer, both of whom would be working for the White House and presumably inclined to be forward leaning on taking out another bad guy.  Based on an interview with White House terrorism adviser John Brennan, Glenn Greenwald believes there might already be dozens of names of American citizens on the list.

And the assault on the constitution goes on from there, with Congress joining in with some enthusiasm.  Senator Joe Lieberman of Connecticut has introduced legislation that would strip US citizens of their citizenship if there is suspicion of their being involved in terrorist related activity.  Again, suspicion is the key word.

Lieberman is also the sponsor of another bill that will enable the United States unilaterally and without any due process to turn off the internet if there is any security threat.  The bill, grandiloquently named the Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act, has already cleared the Homeland Security committee that Lieberman chairs and is now on its way to the full Senate for approval.  The nature of the security threat would, of course, be defined by the US government itself.  Some who actually know how the internet operates believe that it would be impossible to shut it down in the United States where there are multiple servers and redundancies inbuilt into the system, but the government’s intent is clear: control information and you control what the public thinks.  If the public is kept deliberately in the dark, you can quite literally do anything you want to do.  Lieberman, of course, has a particular passion for Israel and it is reasonable to assume that his ultimate intention might be to use the cyberwarfare justification combined with anti-terror legislation to shut down internet sites that provide news and commentary critical of the Benjamin Netanyahu government. 

Americans who care about their country and its constitution should be mortified by recent developments, but, apart from a vocal minority, most people appear to accept that the government is a benign force that will do what is right.  Nothing could be farther from the truth.  The past nine years has seen a sustained assault on the rights guaranteed in the United States bill of rights, an assault in many cases carried out by those very individuals who have sworn an oath to defend the constitution against all enemies domestic and foreign.  History teaches that liberties lost can never be regained.  We are living in an age where the government can conceal what is doing, where it can imprison anyone indefinitely or strip people of citizenship, where it can kill citizens on suspicion, and where it is increasingly seeking to control the public’s access to independent sources of information.  This is a far cry from the Republic that the Founding Fathers envisioned, a monstrous modern corporatist state using all of its resources to maintain a constant state of war overseas and fear at home.

Read more by Philip Giraldi

Article printed from Antiwar.com Original: http://original.antiwar.com
Guess Who Wants to Kill the Internet:

4 Responses to “Executive Privilege”

  • Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich says:

    As long as there are people like Philip Giraldi who are willing to speak out, there is hope for America.

  • Joe Boysen says:

    Thanks again Mr. Giraldi. We are in your debt. Keep fighting Global Judeofascism.


    Dear Donna,

    Please don’t demean yourself and your righteous and proud ancestors both African and European by this kind of blind support for the fraudulent sociopath Bogus Barry Dunham/Obama/Soetero. Elena Kagan is COMPLETELY unqualified for this job, as much as the War Criminal Bush2 nominated and DemOgog Defamation Squad publicly HUMILIATED White House Council Harriet Miers WAS qualified.

    Kagan’s gender/ethnic pandering appointment by this cynical “peace” prize winning anti-war masquerading phoney Chicago politics grafter in search of a Clintonian “twofer” ~ both a woman AND a Jewess ~ is simply DISGUSTING to ALL of us whose forbears built this country. It is another stain on our DISHONORABLE nation even worse than the recent Latina twofer this swine nominated and FOISTED upon our Media TelAviv Mindfog(K)ed and Israeli Occupied WAR CRIMINAL nation. If she wasn’t a Jew or a woman, let alone both, she would be laughed out of court AND out of town.

    Don’t demean yourself trying to peddle this “pig in a poke” for your TOTALLY UNWORTHY boss. If we ARE going to select inexperienced people as high officials on the basis of race and sex, why not select a prominent, well known, trustworthy, QUALIFIED and DESERVING great grand daughter of African slaves, why not someone like yourself Donna?

    But don’t try to foist this fraud Kagan on us Donna, PLEASE. What a betrayal of the colorblind ~ by white people anyway ~ election of 2008 these pander nominations by this empty suit Zelig have been. Surely you see that? Most of us DO, and we’re ANGRY. This warmonger Obabbler has NO chance in 2012. Believe it! We can only hope Jerry Brown will be there to rescue America from the Israel First NeoCon cabal determined to DESTROY her, with your bosses’s active help.

    Regards, Joe Boysen

    — On Thu, 7/1/10, Donna Brazile wrote:

    From: Donna Brazile
    Subject: Elena Kagan
    To: “Joe Boysen”
    Date: Thursday, July 1, 2010, 11:32 AM

    Joe —

    Have you been watching the hearings? The nomination of a Supreme Court justice is a special time in Washington, DC. The air tastes different — it buzzes with an electricity even the humidity can’t conquer — and even more so this time.

    Elena Kagan’s nomination is special. It took us almost 200 years as a country to get the first woman on the Supreme Court, but now we’re on a roll! If Elena Kagan is confirmed, for the first time, we’ll have three women serving together. We’re still a far cry from parity, but we cannot allow the perfect to become the enemy of the good. We’re making progress, and Elena Kagan is great progress.

    Over the past three days of hearings, she has conducted herself with poise, grace, rigor, and humor. She has won praise from liberals and conservatives — prior to her nomination and since. It’s no easy feat to become the first female dean of Harvard Law School and the first female to serve as solicitor general. Her illustrious resume also includes periods as associate White House counsel and deputy policy director under President Bill Clinton, as a teacher at the University of Chicago Law School, and as a law clerk for Justice Thurgood Marshall.

    Lend your name to help us show that the American people back Elena Kagan’s nomination.

    Let there be no doubt: She earned this nomination. It’s not simply because she’s a woman, or because she’s among the best legal minds this country has to offer. I know firsthand the strength of Elena’s character and am certain she is the best choice.

    The Supreme Court nomination process, like almost any political contest, is like a food fight where the nominee does his or her best to stay clean and dry while everyone else in the room slings Sloppy Joes. I’ve watched this before (recently) and there’s nothing the Republicans won’t do to take down a nominee chosen by a president they’ve vowed to obstruct at all costs.

    Republicans are attacking her credibility, her credentials, and her character. They’ve become particularly focused on her work as a clerk for Justice Marshall, seemingly maligning his long and respected service to our country. As chief counsel to the NAACP, Justice Marshall argued the case of Brown v Board of Education. Later he would become the first African American to serve as solicitor general and the first African American to serve as a justice of the Supreme Court. We would be better off with more justices like Marshall, and Kagan’s work for him should be a feather in her cap, not a thorn in her side right now.

    The other side is grabbing at straws, with nothing to support their groundless accusations, but it doesn’t stop the attacks. The Democratic Party is pushing back to ensure that this incredible woman gets a fair hearing, but we must also show that public support for Kagan is overwhelming.

    Sign now:


    Thank you,


    Donna Brazile
    DNC Vice Chair for Voter Registration and Participation
    Democratic National Committee

    Paid for and authorized by the Democratic National Committee, http://www.democrats.org.
    This communication is not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.

    Democratic National Committee, 430 S. Capitol St. SE, Washington, DC 20003

    Contributions or gifts to the Democratic National Committee are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes.
    Click here to unsubscribe from this mailing list.

    “Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and America will do that ……. I want to tell you something very clear:
    -Ariel Sharon nee Ariel “Arik” Scheinermann AKA “Bulldozer”,
    Butcher of Sabra & Chatilla, Bully, Murderer of Rachel Corrie and
    tens of thousands of others since 1942, Terrorist JudeoFascist Dictator Warlord “State of Israel”, a U.S. subsidised “smoke & mirrors”, tanks, jets, nukes & WMD “Crusader Kingdom” military colony “declared” in Occupied Palestine on the ancestral homeland of the Palestinian People since 1200 BC, 95% seized without payment by armed European “refugee” religious/socialist separatist squatter/”colonists” (and 100% “occupied) twixt 1947 & 1967.
    – Quoted in Ha’aretz, Israel’s largest paper, Oct 3, 2001
    The Boysens, 292 El Dorado Way, Shell Beach, Ca., 93449 (805)773-3920

Leave a Reply