Archive for August, 2010

JAMES PETRAS — The State and Local Bases of Zionist Power in America

JAMES PETRAS — The State and Local Bases of Zionist Power in America

‘Neocons controlling the show’

Phil Giraldi with friend Jihan Hafiz on Russia Today: Neocons controlling the show

‘JINSA John’ Bolton is full of ‘Hogwash’:

Neocons Resurfacing in Obama Administration:

Ron Paul’s statement: “Iraq – An End or an Escalation?”

Ron Paul’s statement: “Iraq – An End or an Escalation?”

Iraq – An End or an Escalation?
Amid much fanfare last week, the last supposed “combat” troops left Iraq as the administration touted the beginning of the end of the Iraq War and a change in the role of the United States in that country.  Considering the continued public frustration with the war effort, and with the growing laundry list of broken promises, this was merely another one of the administration’s operations in political maneuvering and semantics in order to convince an increasingly war-weary public that the Iraq War is at last ending.  However, military officials confirm that we are committed to intervention in that country for years to come, and our operations have in fact, changed minimally, if really at all.After eight long draining years, I have to wonder if our government even understands what it is to end a war anymore.  The end of a war, to most people, means all the troops come home, out of harm’s way.  It means we stop killing people and getting killed.  It means we stop sending troops and armed personnel over and draining our treasury for military operations in that foreign land.  But much like the infamous “mission accomplished” moment of the last administration, this “end” of the war also means none of those things.

50,000 US troops remain in Iraq, and they are still receiving combat pay.  One soldier was killed in Basra just last Sunday, after the supposed end of combat operations, and the same day 5,000 men and women of the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment at Fort Hood were deployed to Iraq.  Their mission will be anything but desk duty.  Among other things they will accompany the Iraqi military on dangerous patrols, continue to be involved in the hunt for terrorists, and provide air support for the Iraqi military.  They should be receiving combat pay, because they will be serving a combat role! 

Of course the number of private contractors – who perform many of the same roles as troops, but for a lot more money – is expected to double.  So this is a funny way of ending combat operations in Iraq.  We are still meddling in their affairs and we are still putting our men and women in danger, and we are still spending money we don’t have.  This looks more like an escalation than a draw-down to me!

The ongoing war in Iraq takes place against a backdrop of economic crisis at home, as fresh numbers indicate that our economic situation is as bad as ever, and getting worse!  Our foreign policy is based on an illusion: that we are actually paying for it. What we are doing is borrowing and printing the money to maintain our presence overseas. Americans are seeing the cost of this irresponsible approach as our economic decline continues. Unemployed Americans have been questioning a policy that ships hundreds of billions of dollars overseas while their own communities crumble and their frustration is growing.  An end to this type of foreign policy is way overdue. 

A return to the traditional American foreign policy of active private engagement and non-interventionism is the only alternative that can restore our moral and fiscal health.

Tea Party Hijacked by Neocons as Ron Paul Foreign Policy is Pushed Aside

Tea Party Hijacked by Neocons as Ron Paul Foreign Policy is Pushed Aside

The Tea Party Disconnect (by Philip Giraldi)

Press TV talks to Stephen Sniegoski on American “Third Party”?

Be sure to watch Press TV with Dr. Stephen Sniegoski about his ‘The Transparent Cabal’ book via the link near the top of

MSNBC’s Chris Matthews addressed the Tea Pary split between Ron Paul supporters and Sarah Palin neoconned Republicans on his ‘Hardball’ program today:

Sarah Palin is just a neocon advocate for former PNAC Neocon chairman Bill Kristol:

Neoconned Sarah Palin and the Israel Lobby:

US Partial Withdrawal from Iraq

US Partial Withdrawal from Iraq

(take a look at this Press TV ‘Fine Print’ reality check on the ongoing JINSA/PNAC/AEI Neocon ‘A Clean Break’ inspired Iraq quagmire)

That excellent Press TV ‘Fine Print’ broadcast discussed following must read piece as well:

The Iraq Debacle: The Legacy of Seven Years of War

Ron Paul’s statement: “Iraq – An End or an Escalation?”

Access the following URL for additional on the ‘A Clean Break’/war for Israel agenda that the Iraq invasion was based on:

A Clean Break:

US between two Wars – Empire

Is the US Bankrupt (of course via unnecessary war)?

A campaign for war with Iran begins

A campaign for war with Iran begins

If neocons can’t get Obama to attack Iran, they are creating a narrative so the next Republican president will

A Neocon Preps US for War with Iran

President Petraeus: The Neocons’ Choice:

Israel to attack Syria (and drag US into it!)?

Following just received from Gen (Ret) James David who is mentioned on the cover of the third edition of former Republican Congressman Paul Findley’s ‘They Dare to Speak Out’ book about the power/influence of the pro-Israel lobby (AIPAC and similar) on the US political system and media (keep in mind that Israel attacking Hezbollah in Syria and Lebanon would be in accordance with the ‘A Clean Break’/war for Israel agenda that the Iraq invasion was based on as well): A Clean Break:

Israel planning to attack Hezbollah arms depots in Syria

Saturday, August 28, 2010 11:22 AM
From: General James David
Take note, as to whom the U.S. criticizes in this latest article ( the parts highlighted.)  It’s not Israel that the U.S. criticizes; it’s Syria.  Here we have Israel planning to attack Syria and the U.S. criticizes Syria!!!!   Will things ever change? 
Let me repeat what I have said in the past.  Israel cannot exist without attacking someone.  War is in their blood.  And the U.S. should be held responsible for this disease.  After all, if it were not for the U.S. supplying Israel with over $3 billion a year in the most sophisticated weapons Israel would not be the monster it is today.  
Israel is not satisfied until they eliminate every one of its Arab neighbors, falsely portraying themselves as the victims while promoting this lunatic idea that the Arabs intend to “wipe Israel off the map.”  For your information, there hasn’t been anything even resembling Israel being wiped off the map, while we have seen in just the last few years, all of Gaza nearly wiped off the map and the same thing true with Southern Lebanon. 
Now if Syria or Hezbollah made a pre-emptive attack on Israel right now, especially with this latest intelligence on Israel’s military buildup on Syria’s border, who do you think would be blamed for the attack?  Of course, Syria and Hezbollah would be blamed.  Israel would be given the green light to retaliate and the U.S. would support Israel all the way.  After all, the State Department will say, “Israel has a right to defend themselves.”  They never say the same about Hamas or Hezbollah when they fire first at Israeli tanks built up on the borders.   I guess they don’t have this same right.  
Report: Israel planning to attack Hezbollah arms depots in Syria – Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News
Published 12:02 28.08.10 Latest update 12:02 28.08.10

Report: Israel planning to attack Hezbollah arms depots in Syria

The Kuwaiti newspaper Al Rai reports that Israel is preparing to strike Hezbollah targets in Syria; Al-Arabi Al-Quds reports that western diplomats have asked Bashar Assad to refrain from interfering with Israel-PA direct peace talks.

By Jack Khoury and Haaretz Service Tags: Israel news Syria Hezbollah

Israel is planning to attack Hezbollah arms depots and weapons manufacturing plants in Syria, the Kuwaiti newspaper Al Rai reported on Saturday.

The report is based on Western sources who asserted that Israel has increased its military force level along the northern border in the Golan Heights and Mount Dov areas.

The report cited European sources who claimed that recent Israeli unmanned aerial drone flights over Lebanon and Syria signal Israel’s intentions to carry out operations in the area.

IAF F-16 AP File Photo Israel Air Force F-16 taking off on a mission.
Photo by: AP

According to the report, Israel plans to attack Hezbollah weapons depots, including ones deep inside Syria that store long-range rockets.

The Al Rai report said that the situation on the Israel-Syria border is tense and that Syria could respond immediately to any Israeli attack and not demonstrate the restraint that it did after the Israeli Air Force bombed a suspected nuclear reactor in Syria in the fall of 2007.

According to the report, Syria’s military is on high alert and is strengthening its anti-aircraft defenses along the border with Israel and at strategic sites within Syria.

Western diplomats to Assad: Don’t interfere in Israel-PA talks

Also on Saturday, the Al-Quds Al-Arabi newspaper reported that western nations, including the United States, have in recent days asked Syria to refrain from negatively interfering with the upcoming direct peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, set to open next week in Washington.

According to the report, American officials expressed their firm opposition to Syrian President Bashar Assad taking any position or exerting any influence on the talks, as they fear that another failure of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians could lead to even graver consequences than did past failed talks.

The report said that Assad was also asked to restrain Palestinian militant organizations that operate on Syrian territory, including Hamas and Islamic Jihad.


The Nazification of the United States


August 26, 2010

The Nazification of the United States

death of the First Amendment

By Paul Craig Roberts 

Chuck Norris is no pinko-liberal-commie, and Human Events is a very conservative publication. The two have come together to produce one of the most important articles of our time, “Obama’s US Assassination Program.”

It seems only yesterday that Americans, or those interested in their civil liberties, were shocked that the Bush regime so flagrantly violated the FlSA law against spying on American citizens without a warrant. A federal judge serving on the FISA court even resigned in protest to the illegality of the spying. 

Nothing was done about it.  “National security” placed the president and executive branch above the law of the land. Civil libertarians worried that the US government was freeing its power from the constraints of law, but no one else seemed to care.

Encouraged by its success in breaking the law, the executive branch early this year announced that the Obama regime has given itself the right to murder Americans abroad if such Americans are considered a “threat.”  “Threat” was not defined and, thus, a death sentence would be issued by a subjective decision of an unaccountable official.

There was hardly a peep out of the public or the media. Americans and the media were content for the government to summarily execute traitors and turncoats, and who better to identify traitors and turncoats than the government with all its spy programs.

The problem with this sort of thing is that once it starts, it doesn’t stop. As Norris reports citing Obama regime security officials, the next stage is to criminalize dissent and criticism of the government.  The May 2010 National Security Strategy states: “We are now moving beyond traditional distinctions between homeland and national security. . . . This includes a determination to prevent terrorist attacks against the American people by fully coordinating the actions that we take abroad with the actions and precautions that we take at home.”[PDF]

Most Americans will respond that the “indispensable” US government would never confuse an American exercising First Amendment rights with a terrorist or an enemy of the state. But, in fact, governments always have. Even one of our Founding Fathers, John Adams and the Federalist Party, had their “Alien and Sedition Acts” which targeted the Republican press.

Few with power can brook opposition or criticism, especially when it is a simple matter for those with power to sweep away constraints upon their power in the name of “national security.” Deputy National Security Adviser John Brennan recently explained that more steps are being taken, because of the growing number of Americans who have been “captivated by extremist ideology or causes.” Notice that this phrasing goes beyond concern with Muslim terrorists.

In pursuit of hegemony over both the world and its own subjects, the US government is shutting down the First Amendment and turning criticism of the government into an act of “domestic extremism,” a capital crime punishable by execution, just as it was in Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Russia. 

Initially German courts resisted Hitler’s illegal acts. Hitler got around the courts by creating a parallel court system, like the Bush regime did with its military tribunals. It won’t be long before a decision of the US Supreme Court will not mean anything. Any decision that goes against the regime will simply be ignored.

This is already happening in Canada, an American puppet state. Writing for the Future of Freedom Foundation, Andy Worthington documents the lawlessness of the US trial of Canadian Omar Khadr. In January of this year, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the interrogation of Khadr constituted “state conduct that violates the principles of fundamental justice” and “offends the most basic Canadian standards about the treatment of detained youth suspects.” According to the Toronto Star, the Court instructed the government to “shape a response that reconciled its foreign policy imperatives with its constitutional obligations to Khadr,” but the puppet prime minister of Canada, Stephen Harper, ignored the Court and permitted the US government to proceed with its lawless abuse of a Canadian citizen.[Khadr ill-served without Supreme Court prescription, By Chantal Hébert, August 11, 2010]

September 11 destroyed more than lives, World Trade Center buildings, and Americans’ sense of invulnerability. The event destroyed American liberty, the rule of law and the US Constitution.

Paul Craig Roberts [email him] was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury during President Reagan’s first term.  He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal.  He has held numerous academic appointments, including the William E. Simon Chair, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, and Senior Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He was awarded the Legion of Honor by French President Francois Mitterrand. He is the author of Supply-Side Revolution : An Insider’s Account of Policymaking in Washington;  Alienation and the Soviet Economy and Meltdown: Inside the Soviet Economy, and is the co-author with Lawrence M. Stratton of The Tyranny of Good Intentions : How Prosecutors and Bureaucrats Are Trampling the Constitution in the Name of Justice. Click here for Peter Brimelow’s Forbes Magazine interview with Roberts about the recent epidemic of prosecutorial misconduct.

Pro-Attack On Iran? Anti-Israel!

Pro-Attack On Iran? Anti-Israel!

A Neocon Preps US for War with Iran

Neocons resurfacing in Obama administration

Neocons resurfacing in Obama administration

Press TV’s Kaneez Fatima talks to James Morris on War in Afghanistan

Phil Giraldi with Jihan Hafiz on ‘Russia Today’: ‘Neocons controlling the show’

Who Owns General Petraeus (see comments section at bottom of following URL if interested further)?:

Pro-Israel biased media threat to US Security (General Petraeus scheming with neocon Max Boot mentioned):

Additional via following URL:

Press TV’s Kaneez Fatima talks to James Morris on US Blasphemy

Thom Hartmann was interviewed as well in the ‘Russia Today’ segment linked above (following tells one all they need to know about him!):

Thom Hartmann cuts off caller after bringing up the Mearsheimer/Walt ‘The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy’ book:

Here is a tiny URL of the above one:

Thom Hartmann’s Hypocrisy for Israel – Part 1

Following is the youtube for Part 1:

Thom Hartmann’s Hypocrisy for Israel – Part 2

Here is the youtube for part 2:

White man’s burden
The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history. Two of them, journalists William Kristol and Charles Krauthammer, say it’s possible. But another journalist, Thomas Friedman (not part of the group), is skeptical
Additional via following URL
Thinking about Neoconservatism (must read article linked at following URL which conveys how neocons have used ‘democracy’ as a mask for their war for Israel agenda):

The Source of America’s Wars – Kristol Clear [VIDEO]