McCain/Lieberman Death Camp Act of 2010 now in committee: S. 3081: Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution

I think the ‘Death Camp’ mention in the following post is a bit much, but I don’t like what is going with such (does this mean that anyone dissenting against US policy is support of Israel’s brutal oppression of the Palestinians can be rounded up and detained indefinitely as well?!)
 
McCain/Lieberman Death Camp Act of 2010 now in committee: S. 3081: Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution
 

From: Gary Jacobucci [mailto:jaco@citlink.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 3:43 PM
To: alexjamesi@gmail.com
Subject: McCain Death Camp Act of 2010 now in committee: S. 3081: Enemy
Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution

S. 3081: Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of
2010 is now in committee

Text available at
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s111-3081

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. BROWN of
Massachusetts, Mr. WICKER, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. LEMIEUX, Mr. SESSIONS, and Mr.
VITTER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to
the Committee on the Judiciary

  _____  

A BILL

To provide for the interrogation and detention of enemy belligerents who
commit hostile acts against the United States, to establish certain
limitations on the prosecution of such belligerents for such acts, and for
other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention,
and Prosecution Act of 2010’.

Clif High (HalfPastHuman) comment.”any bastard, without regard to race,
creed, color, or religion, who pisses off officialdom or TPTB or their
minions, will be declared an ‘enemy of the state’ and ‘indefinitely
incarcerated’ under the ‘authority’ of what will become the McCain Death
Camp Act of 2010.

(TPTB: the powers that be)

—————————————————————————————–

We already saw how Lieberman is going after the Internet as well:

 
Guess who wants to kill the Internet:
 
 
Lieberman Introduces Bill Targeting Internet Freedom
 
——————————————————————————————————————-

2 Responses to “McCain/Lieberman Death Camp Act of 2010 now in committee: S. 3081: Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution”

  • Patriot says:

    Response to McCain/Lieberman Act of 2010

    http://www.israelvworld.com/index-2.htm

  • I reviewed the text of the current bill and it seems intentionally vague in re: to the issue and definition of:

    “…..who is suspected of engaging in hostilities against the United States……”

    and, “……purposely and materially supporting such hostilities……”

    I take the position that I am a law-abiding U.S. citizen taxpayer who complains about my tax dollars being spent by my government in an illegal manner, and I am going to continue to complain about my tax dollars being spent in the illegal manner my own government is spending my tax dollars. It is categorically illegal for my government to provide U.S. weapons bought and paid for with U.S. tax dollars to nations who utilize our U.S. weapons in an offensive manner/capacity. Israel has been using our American-made and provided weapons in an offensive manner and capacity for decades now. This is a U.S. government FACT!

    As you know, our own U.S. State Dept. has already sanctioned Israel several times for using our American-made and provided weapons in an offensive manner/capacity, in violation of our U.S. Arms Control Export Act. I contend our U.S. government has a duty to follow our own laws; and as such, our government should NOT be providing the Israeli government with American-made weapons the IDF has been using for decades in an offensive manner. Islamic terrorists should have sued the U.S. government instead of physically attacking the U.S. government, since the Movants have sufficient basis in law and fact to survive summary judgment in U.S. District Court. The legal theory would not be UNLIKE an auto accident or simple negligence case:

    1. Duty owed;

    2. Violation of that duty owed;

    3. Substantial injury;

    4. As a direct and proximate cause of Defendant’s violation of duty owed, Plaintiff was injured.

    Verdict for the Plaintiff.

    Islamic terrorists could have bellied up to the bar as just another special interest in the Beltway. The 9/11 hijackers should have hired a Houston law firm and a Los Angeles publicist instead of hijacking airplanes – they’d have a spot in Congress and the media right about now.

    Further, my opposition to Israeli government policy is based on the past conduct of the Israeli government, certainly not anything to do with Judaism, per se. To oppose Judaism would be anti-semetic; to oppose Israeli government policy and conduct is pro-human rights – for Israelis and Palestinians. When an Israeli soldier stands on Palestinian land and fires his American-made weapon into a Palestinian’s body, that is not “defending Israel.” No, that’s an uber-violation of the unfortunate Palestinian’s individual human rights, not to mention a violation of international law and peace agreements. The “Defending Israel” concept is invalid, misleading and bogus; Why? Because the concept of “Defending Israel” excludes the one-state solution. If all Israelis and Palestinians lived under one state with equal human rights, then there would be no such thing as “Defending Israel” because there would no more, “Israel” as the ethnically-cleansed apartheid state Israel currently exists as.

    Unfortunately, Israeli government officials oppose the One-State Solution, since such a state would require Israelis to treat Palestinians as equals re: human rights and citizenry. No, instead Israeli officials prefer and fight for a racially-pure state of Israel, engaging in institutional ethnic-cleansing to maintain a racially-pure Israel. How in the hell can any decent American support such a gang of racists? Moreover, why should our precious American tax dollars fund such Israeli hate-filled racist government policies?

    Don’t you know that Lieberman and the other Zionists here in our government wish they could pass a law prohibiting Americans from blaming the U.S. government for anything, much less blaming U.S. government policy and unconstitutional military operations for acts of terrorism directed against America.?

    As you know, the reality and truth is, U.S. support, arming and funding of Israel is why Islamic terrorists hate us and attack us. It doesn’t have a damn thing to do with terrorists hating our hot dogs, apple pies, Chevrolets and freedom – no, it is the fact our Congress has been funding and arming Israel’s 45-year long illegal Israeli military occupation of the Palestinian territories that motivates the Islamic boy into acting as “Islamic terrorist.”

    It makes an American proud of our First Amendment Free Speech Rights, because if we didn’t have the right to free speech on this subject, we would surely be jailed for what the government deems, “anti-government activity.” In our opinion(s), our conduct is pro-government activity because we seek to cure our government of the unlawful conduct of U.S. government officials and unconstitutional policies of our U.S. government.

    We don’t hate our form of government! We love our form of government! It’s the player’s we hate – not the game.

    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ‘Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010’.

    SEC. 2. PLACEMENT OF SUSPECTED UNPRIVILEGED ENEMY BELLIGERENTS IN MILITARY CUSTODY.

    (a) Military Custody Requirement- Whenever within the United States, its territories, and possessions, or outside the territorial limits of the United States, an individual is captured or otherwise comes into the custody or under the effective control of the United States who is suspected of engaging in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners through an act of terrorism, or by other means in violation of the laws of war, or of purposely and materially supporting such hostilities, and who may be an unprivileged enemy belligerent, the individual shall be placed in military custody for purposes of initial interrogation and determination of status in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

Leave a Reply