Archive for October 24th, 2010

Pro-Israel interests control AJC World News

General (Ret) James David (who is mentioned on the cover of the third edition of former Republican Congressman Paul Findley’s ‘They Dare to Speak Out’ book about the power/influence of the pro-Israel lobby on the US political system and media) sent through the following:

 James David wrote:

Take a look at the Atlanta Journal-Constitution’s World News, and it’s likely that the leading story will be a story on Iran.  Hardly a day goes by that the AJC doesn’t have it’s major story depicting Iran as the major threat in the Middle East, and today is no exception.  The news in the world might have many more important stories to report but it seems that the AJC prefers to publish derogatory stories on Iran in favor of the more important world news, especially when the news is unfavorable to Israel.  In that case, seldom, if ever, will this news be reported.
For example, we have the Israeli government issuing demolition orders on 22 Palestinian homes in Arab East Jerusalem yet nothing is mentioned about this important story in the AJC.  It’s important because the Israeli government has demolished more than 17,000 homes of Palestinians since 1967 and along with illegal Jewish settlements, demolition of Palestinian homes is the leading cause of the continued violence between Israel and the Palestinians.  This story never made today’s paper, but the supposed Iranian bribes to Afghan officials was the major “World News” story. You have to go to Israel’s leading newspaper, Haaretz, to get the story on Israel’s demolition orders Police clash with Arab youth while distributing demolition orders in East Jerusalem – Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News .
We have the Vatican condemning Israel’s brutal and illegal occupation and criticizing Israel’s use of the Bible to justify the Jewish presence in the occupied territories.    Vatican City: Israel Should End Occupation and this important story gets just a one paragraph summary in the “World in Brief” section of today’s AJC.  This is a major story of historical relevance. Bishops from the Middle East who were summoned to Rome by the Pope demanded yesterday that Israel accept UN resolutions calling for an end to its “occupation” of Arab lands. In a final joint communique, the bishops also told Israel it shouldn’t use the Bible to justify “injustices” against the Palestinians.   Once again, a major story and we have to get the news from Israel and the Jerusalem Post  Vatican synod calls for end to Israel’s ‘occupation’
What is the motivation behind this trend?  Why do journalists refuse to publish stories of the real problems in the Middle East, the problems that motivated the attack on September 11?  I can only come to one conclusion and I will keep that conclusion to myself for the time being, but I think you get the story.  Is Jewish interests buying media influence in order to convince the public that Iran is our real enemy, only because Iran is really Israel’s primary enemy?   And using American blood and American money to do Israel’s dirty work is exactly what they have in mind, just as they were able to convince our leaders that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.  Until we get this dangerous influence out of our government and out of our media there will never be peace in this world.
James J. David


Israel first Democrats in US Congress urge Obama to release Pollard

Democrats in US Congress urge Obama to release Pollard

Wake-Up, America (by Philip Giraldi)

‘Pollard’s release, a political gain’ (Press TV interview with Philip Giraldi)

The Israel Lobby: Targeting Democrats for Election Day Defeat

By MJ Rosenberg

October 22, 2010 “Huffington Post” — The fury of the “pro-Israel” lobby lately has truly been something to behold.

The Israel Lobby: Targeting Democrats for Election Day Defeat 


Israel orders demolition orders on 22 Palestinian homes

General (Ret) James David (who is mentioned on the cover of the third edition of former Republican Congressman Paul Findley’s ‘They Dare Speak Out’ book about the power/influence of the pro-Israel lobby on the US political & media) sent through the following as well!: 

Israel orders demolition orders on 22 Palestinian homes

Sunday, October 24, 2010 8:48 AM
From: General James David

Our peace loving ally in the Middle East, Israel, is planning to demolish 22 homes of Palestinians living on their own land in East Jerusalem.  The U.S. and Europe opposed the demolition order but, as usual, the Israelis just thumbed its nose at anyone who opposes anything that they do.  Too bad we don’t have political leaders who aren’t always taking their commands from the Jewish lobby.  But then, our own Congress is under zionist occupation.  Is it any wonder the U.S. is sinking to the bottom and has lost all respect all over the world?
Police clash with Arab youth while distributing demolition orders in East Jerusalem – Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News
Published 16:56 24.10.10 Latest update 16:56 24.10.10

Police clash with Arab youth while distributing demolition orders in East Jerusalem

Mayor Nir Barkat has approved a development program in Silwan to raze 22 Palestinian homes that were built without permits, and to construct a tourism center in their place.

Tags: Israel news East Jerusalem

Jerusalem municipal supervisors on Sunday distributed four demolition orders to homeowners in the Arab neighborhood of Silwan, in the east of the city. Clashes broke out between local youths and the officers accompanying the supervisors; police responded by firing tear gas.

Mayor Nir Barkat has approved a development program in that neighborhood to raze 22 Palestinian homes that were built without permits, and to construct a tourism center in their place. An additional 66 homes built without the proper permits would receive approval.

silwan - AP - October 17 2010 A Palestinian pausing after throwing stones during clashes with Border Police in Silwan on Friday.
Photo by: AP

The tourism center for the area, which is called Al Bustan in Arabic and Gan Hamelekh (King’s Garden) in Hebrew, is to include restaurants and boutique hotels

The city said it will help the residents of the 22 homes slated for demolition to move to other areas of Silwan.

Local residents oppose the plan and claim that its purpose is to increase the hold of Jewish settlers over the neighborhood. They have submitted an alternative plan that does not involve the demolition of homes but still includes the park that is part of the city’s plan. The zoning panel did not discuss the alternative plan, which angered council members on the left.

The program also met significant opposition from European states and the U.S., but was nevertheless approved by the city’s planning and building council.

In light of the pressure facing the city now with regard to construction and planning, the demolition will not likely take place in the near future.

The city called the distribution of orders a “routine procedure” of applying court rulings across the city.

Leaked Iraq war files portray weak, divided nation

Leaked Iraq war files portray weak, divided nation


Published: Today

Founder of the WikiLeaks website, Julian Assange, speaks during a press conference in London, Saturday, Oct. 23, 2010. WikiLeaks revealed on Saturday previously secret files on the Iraq war, which in the biggest leak of secret information in U.S. history suggest that far more Iraqis died than previously acknowledged during the years of sectarian bloodletting and criminal violence unleashed by the 2003 U.S.-led invasion.(AP Photo/Lennart Preiss)

WASHINGTON (AP) – The enormous cache of secret war logs disclosed by the WikiLeaks website paints a picture of an Iraq burdened by persistent sectarian tension and meddling neighbors, suggesting that the country could drift into chaos once U.S. forces leave.

The reports, covering early 2004 to Jan. 1, 2010, help explain why Iraq’s struggle to create a unified, independent state continues, despite a dramatic reduction in violence. They appear to support arguments by some experts that the U.S. should keep thousands of troops there beyond their scheduled departure in 2011, to buy more time for Iraq to become stable.

The threats described in the leaked documents come from outside, including next-door Iran, as well as inside, in the form of sectarian, political and even family rivalries that predate the 2003 American-led invasion and endure today.

The reports demonstrate the weakness of Iraq’s civic institutions, court system and military, even before sectarian violence exploded in 2006-2007.

In the fall of 2005, the U.S. military discovered evidence of plots to assassinate various officials, including an Iraqi Army colonel. In September, one of the war logs said, a group of judges was abducted in Balad, beaten and forced into the trunk of a car.

Another example: On June 6, 2006, U.S. forces reported discovering large amounts of blood on the floor, a rubber hose and electric wires rigged to a metal door in a holding cell in an Iraqi police station in Husaybah, in western Iraq.

The report called the discoveries “evidence of unchecked torture” and “clear indications” of human rights violations.

The U.S. report said that for a time, U.S. military advisers slept in the police station to make sure prisoners were not abused, checked arrest logs and counseled Iraqi police, warning them against these practices.

But even a program of training and counseling didn’t put an end to the abuses. According to a report dated Feb. 16, 2009, U.S. forces reported the mistreatment of 33 detainees in custody at the same police station.

The Associated Press was given access to a redacted WikiLeaks database hours before its general release Friday, but was not provided the raw data. The documents appear to be authentic, but their origin could not be confirmed independently.

The leaked war logs reflect significant progress as well. There has been a dramatic improvement in security since the height of the violence in 2006-07, due to a weakened threat from al-Qaida and an Iraqi population weary of the sectarian bloodletting that once threatened to plunge the country into civil war.

Even so, some experts question whether the fledgling military and police forces are capable of defending Iraq after Washington completes its scheduled pullout Dec. 31, 2011.

Those who hold these pessimistic views also worry Iraq could repeat its history of turning to a military dictator in the mold of Saddam Hussein.

Ryan Crocker, ambassador to Iraq in 2007-08, said Washington has decided to turn the page on Iraq but must not close the book.

“We’re still very much at the beginning of this story, or more to the point, the Iraqis are at the beginning of their new narrative in their history, and for all of the extraordinary achievements that we’ve seen, the list of challenges is even greater,” he said Friday.

One major challenge is the country’s political paralysis. Iraqi politicians are struggling to form a new government seven months after a national election failed to produce a clear winner. That’s a symptom, to some, of the country’s stubborn religious and ethnic schisms.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s opponents said the WikiLeaks documents showed he must be stopped from consolidating power. Al-Maliki’s office responded by saying the document leak was timed to sabotage his re-election hopes.

Crocker called it “profoundly important” that the U.S. maintain a military presence in Iraq beyond 2011, despite America’s weariness with the long and costly war and pressure to shift more resources to Afghanistan.

The leaked documents posted by WikiLeaks recount Iran’s role in arming and training Shiite militia groups and seeking to influence Iraqi politics – a concern that may deepen as American influence in Baghdad wanes.

In Crocker’s view, Iraq will struggle for years with profound internal political and social problems. Meanwhile, he said, Iran is in effect telling Iraq: “Looks like the Americans are leaving, and guess what – flash news – we’re staying.”

Before the U.S.-led invasion, predominantly Arab Iraq was stronger militarily than Persian Iran, an old foe.

Today, due to the U.S. defeat of Saddam’s forces and its dismantling of his army, Iran enjoys a vast numerical advantage over Iraq in battle tanks and other weapons of war. Iran is likely to keep that edge for years to come.

Anthony Cordesman, a military analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a frequent visitor to Iraq, said that it could be another decade before Iraq has an effective air force.

In 2003, Iraq had 2,200 main battle tanks, compared with 1,565 for Iran, Cordesman wrote in a new assessment of Iraq’s military. Today, Iran’s fleet of main battle tanks has swelled to 1,613 while Iraq’s has fallen to 149.

By Cordesman’s calculations, Iraq’s security forces are going to be much less capable in December 2011 – when the last U.S. troops are scheduled to depart – than was planned when the Bush administration negotiated the withdrawal agreement just two years ago.


AP National Security writer Anne Gearan and Associated Press writer Pauline Jelinek contributed to this report


Fragmentation of Iraq for Israel (by Stephen Sniegoski):