Archive for May 29th, 2011

Israel Is The Ultimate American Welfare State

Israel Is The Ultimate American Welfare State

http://www.politicususa.com/en/israel-welfare-state

 ‘Pro-Israel lobby has stranglehold on US political system’

http://www.presstv.com/usdetail/181337.html

Additional via http://tinyurl.com/AIPACStrangleholdonUS

Robert Fisk: A tale from the frontline of Palestinian protest

Robert Fisk: A tale from the frontline of Palestinian protest

 
 
Robert Fisk wrote the following article for the UK Independent about the JINSA crowd’s war for Israel plan in the Middle East:
 
Robert Fisk’s article about the JINSA crowd and its war for Israel agenda in the Mideast:
 

US Congress mesmerized by Netanyahu’s “lies and illusions”

US Congress mesmerized by Netanyahu’s “lies and illusions”

LOCATION (URL) –
http://www.redress.cc/americas/ldavidson20110530

SYNOPSIS – Lawrence Davidson views the “sustained standing ovations” given to
Israel’s Binyamin Netanyahu at the US Congress on 24 May. He argues that
Congress’s “accepted version of reality is maintained by Zionist misinformation
fortified by donor dollars to the campaigns of both parties” and that in US
politics “it is the money that conditions the mind to an uncritical acceptance
of a perverted reality”.

FOR THE FULL STORY, GO TO:
http://www.redress.cc/americas/ldavidson20110530

‘The smallest minds and cowardliest hearts': Is Congress clapping for apartheid?

http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/05/25/the_smallest_minds_and_cowardliest_hearts_is_congress_clapping_for_apartheid?utm_source=

‘The smallest minds and cowardliest hearts': Is Congress clapping for apartheid?

Posted By Stephen M. Walt http://www.foreignpolicy.com/images/091022_meta_block.gif Wednesday, May 25, 2011 – 1:13 PM http://www.foreignpolicy.com/images/091022_meta_block.gif http://www.foreignpolicy.com/images/091022_more_icon.gif Share

Mark Twain once described members of Congress as having “the smallest minds and the selfishest souls and the cowardliest hearts that God makes.” Twain’s mordant assessment provides a parsimonious explanation for the predictably rapturous reception that Bibi Netanyahu received there yesterday. All one can say about the vast majority of our courageous elected officials is that they aren’t genuine friends of Israel, because every burst of applause was another nail in the coffin of the Zionist dream.  

Why? Because Netanyahu’s central message yesterday was an emphatic rejection of a genuine two-state solution. While professing to be willing to make major sacrifices for the sake of peace, his lengthy list of preconditions made it abundantly clear that he thinks Israel is entitled to rule the Palestinian population in perpetuity-even when it becomes numerically larger than Israel’s Jewish citizens — and that the United States should back this effort no matter what. And even though the only alternatives to a two-state solution are 1) further ethnic cleansing, 2) a binational, one-state democracy, or 3) permanent apartheid, Congress is just fine with that.

It would be both tiresome and fruitless to fisk Netanyahu’s speech in its entirety, but you can find intelligent commentary on it herehere, here, and here. And don’t miss Lara Friedman’s hilarious annotated version here. Among his various applause lines, my personal favorite was the claim that Israel has to keep its settlements because 650,000 people (i.e., about 10 percent of Israel’s population) now live in them. (It’s not entirely clear where Netanyahu got that number, as most estimates of the settler population put it “only” half a million or so.)

The key point, however, is that the settlements didn’t sprout spontaneously, and the settlers themselves didn’t just show up by accident. On the contrary, the vast majority of the settlers are there because every Israeli government since 1967 has actively promoted and subsidized the colonization of the West Bank, even though this policy is contrary to international law and at odds with measures such as U.N. Security Council Resolution 242. Not only does 242 say that Israel should withdraw from territories occupied in the Six Day War (the French version of the official text  says “the territories”) but it begins by emphasizing “the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force.” The United States played a key role in drafting the resolution, and then effectively ignored its implications for the next forty years.

Some people still believe that settlement building was just a wacky project undertaken and backed primarily by religious extremists and by rightwing parties like Likud. In fact, colonization of the West Bank began under the Labor-led governments in the 1960s and 1970s, and governments of all stripes have backed it without exception. Read Gershom Gorenberg’s Accidental Empire, Idith Zertal and Akiva Eldar’s Lords of the Land, or Shlomo Gazit’s Trapped Foolsand you will learn that settlement building was a deliberate policy designed to “create facts,” so that future prime ministers like Netanyahu could claim it was simply impossible for Israel to withdraw.  And the location of key settlement blocs like Ariel and Ma’ale Adumim were chosen to secure Israeli control over key aquifers and make it difficult-to-impossible to create a viable Palestinian state. 

As I said in my previous post, Israel faces a choice — a two-state solution or apartheid — and it is now crystal-clear which one Netanyahu has chosen. I see this situation as genuinely tragic, as he is condemning several more generations to live in bitter conflict and putting his own country’s future at risk. That’s his privilege, I suppose, but America’s blind support for this foolish policy is also a serious threat to U.S. national security. So if your Congressman or Senator was clapping loudly yesterday, you might drop him or her a note and ask why they care more about subsidizing an illegal and unjust occupation than they do about America’s long-term welfare and well-being. You’ll probably discover that Twain was on to something.