USS Liberty Survivors Invoke Benghazi, Demand Hearings

Liberty Survivors Invoke Benghazi, Demand Hearings:

Following comment shows in comments section at bottom of above article:

WHY McCain doesn’t want to talk: –

There are Two Main reasons why Senator John McCain wants to keep the attack on the USS Liberty buried.

1-  McCain’s Father (Admiral John S McCain) was in charge of US Naval Forces in Europe at the time of the attack and Admiral McCain was involved in the COVER-UP, of the attack on the Liberty.

2-  In America, huge sums of Money are needed to Win Elections at the National Level.  (Congress, President)   Wealthy American Jews give huge sums of Cash to Pro-Israeli Congressmen and Congresswomen.   Anyone deemed to be “anti-Israel” is cut off from Funding.  As a result, it’s very hard to Win an Election at the National Level, unless the candidate is a full time stooge to the powerful US Israeli Lobby.  (AIPAC)


Israel 1st traitor John McCain confronted about USS Liberty cover-up: & &

One Response to “USS Liberty Survivors Invoke Benghazi, Demand Hearings”

  • Michael says:

    Is there a connection between Ansar al-Sharia and the CIA or neocons or Romney?..In terms of funding,training,arms or past to present collaborations between the the US government and Ansar al-Sharia,such as the overthrow of the Gaddafi regime in 2011.

    I am not a conspiracy nut,my problem is that I don’t believe in coincidence.

    In that famous hidden video Romney anticipated a foreign policy crisis that he was looking forward to exploiting,and 5 months later there was that well organized and armed attack in Benghazi…Romney’s “October Surprise” in September?

    “The Ansar al-Sharia CIA Jihadi Contra were meant to kidnap Chris Stevens and drive him to Cairo.

    They would then release hostage tapes daily demanding the release of the Blind Sheikh Omar Abdulrahman until polling day.”

    In politics you go after your opponents perceived strong suit,and before a manufactured crisis in the middle east ignited by that inflammatory Innocence of Muslims video (produced by an Obama hater),the president’s perceived strong suit wasn’t the economy,but was foreign policy,”he got Bin Laden”.

    I also don’t believe that the timing of these two events are coincidental, the wide release of the offensive video and the obviously pre planned attack in Benghazi coinciding together like they did,it was too perfect or convenient.

    BUT,all this said,if we can’t link the neocons and/or CIA with the Libyan militias,especially Ansar,then we’re going to be stuck with neocon chickenhawks like Hannity obsessing over Benghazi forever,we’ll never be able to shut them up about it.

    When it comes to means,motive and opportunity and Benghazi,it all points to the intended beneficiary of the attack,which wasn’t Obama,but Romney and his powerful neocon allies,including “Bibi”.

    Obama was only hurt by the attack,then and since,so that had to be the idea,the purpose behind the manufactured crisis in the middle east,including Benghazi,and I doubt that Ansar wanted to do damage to the Obama campaign nearly as much as Romney and the neocons.

    I apologize for going long here,just please comment on that first short paragraph,thank you.

Leave a Reply