Would a Clinton Win Mean More Neocon Inspired Wars?

Would a Clinton Win Mean More (Neocon Inspired) Wars?


Hillary Is the Candidate of the War Machine


Hillary Clinton Is A Threat To All Of Humanity:

Clintonites prepare for war on Syria:



Why Neocons are supporting Hillary Clinton:


Hillary Bringing in the Now-Neoconized Hawkish Foreign Policy Elite:


And look at following ones as well:

Clinton Email Shows US Sought Syria Regime Change for Israel’s Sake:

Insisted Russia Wouldn’t Dare Interfere:


“If I’m President, We Will Attack Iran”: On Friday, presidential aspirant Hillary Clinton:


Clinton: ‘Not accurate, fair or useful’ to primarily blame Israel for peace failures
In interview with New York Jewish Week, Democratic front-runner distances herself from Obama administration, lambastes Palestinian inaction, says her commitment to Israel is ‘personal’
Hawkish Hillary Clinton and Her Israel-First Political Sugar Daddy Haim Saban:

Zionist Neocons (advising Hillary): Seeking War to the End of the World:


Are the Clintons Israeli Agents?
Man who “ran the CIA” offers an entirely new perspective


7 Responses to “Would a Clinton Win Mean More Neocon Inspired Wars?”

  • Patriot says:

    Via Peter Thottam at Facebook:


    Hillary Clinton’s two core problems for Nov. 2016: (1) No real vision as to addressing the increasing class injustices/inequities that are growing in America; (2) Lack of Trust: No one (apart from the global 1%, Walmart / Goldman & Exxon execs, and except for ardent feminists who just want a woman in the White House) trusts her … She is not a leader. She hasn’t achieved any broad-based sense of inspired loyalty. Her focus is ascribed status based on the Clinton name and her gender.

    Four of Clinton’s top five donors since 1999 are Wall Street firms. Clinton’s deep family relations (via Bill Clinton’s heavily Wall State biased presidency from ’92 to 2000 (Robert Rubin (GS, Citi)) and her own daughter (Chelsea married to Marc Mezvinsky (ex-GS partner, current hedge fund trader)) are deep and far reaching. They key off Walmart/Rose-Law firm partnership and the outsourcing of the productivity of the US economy (read labor exploitation) during the 1990s to China and E. Asia/Latin America. Hillary Clinton is now worth over $50 million. Her daughter, Chelsea, is married into Goldman Sachs via her husband (Marc Mezvinsky). Marc was a former Goldman Sachs partner and current NY / Connecticut hedge fund owner/trader. He and Chelsea had a lavish $3 MILLION Wedding own both a $10.5 million NY condo and a separate $5 million NY property.

    Hillary Clinton & Chelsea ($600,000 former part-time job annual salary with GE/MSNBC for a few puff pieces on MSNBC – see (1) https://www.washingtonpost.com/…/chelsea-clinton…/) and (2) Chelsea’s Pro-Israel/Zionist Wall Street embodiment husband, Marc Mezvinsky (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Mezvinsky) are solidly in the pay of Wall Street and the 1%.

    See also Marc Rich & Hillary Clinton’s family friend, Marc’s father Edward Mezvinsky ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Mezvinsky — in federal prison for 5 years for wire fraud & bribing federal officials on behalf of Clinton pardoned banker Marc Rich (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Rich)).

    p.s.: GE (owner of MSNBC) — 3rd largest military contractor in the US. CNN/AOL-TIME-WARNER-Capitol Cities ABC (same story). Hence the biased media coverage for Hillary.

  • Patriot says:

    Democrats big tent shrinking as Clinton ties up nomination:


  • Patriot says:

    Stephen Sniegoski wrote:

    Hillary Clinton is a war hawk whose positions are almost identical to that of the neocons. That is why so many neocons are openly supporting her—Max Boot, Eliot Cohen, Robert Kagan (co-founder of PNAC), Jennifer Rubin (the Washington Post’s most extreme neocon), James Kirchik (of the neocon Foreign Policy Institute). Other neocons have not yet openly endorsed her but praise her foreign policy—John Podhoretz (the son of neocon godfather Norman Podhoretz) being one of these.
    There are many articles on the web referring to Hillary C. as a hawk. Most are critical. The New York Times has a relatively friendly piece about her entitled: “How Hillary Clinton Became a Hawk”: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/magazine/how-hillary-clinton-became-a-hawk.html

    What does this mean? If you like neocon wars, you should back Hillary. If you don’t, you shouldn’t.

  • Patriot says:

    Stephen Sniegoski wrote: Victoria Nuland is one of Hillary Clinton’s protégés at the State Department, and could become Hillary’s secretary of state or national-security adviser. Nuland was the driving force behind efforts to destabilize the Ukrainian government. Neocon Robert Kagan, the neocon co-founder of the Project for the New American Century, is her husband. Nuland was an adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney:

    Clinton’s Hawk-in-Waiting

    If Hillary wins the White House, expect Victoria Nuland to be at her side:


  • Patriot says:

    Hillary Clinton and Her Hawks

    Focusing on domestic issues, Hillary Clinton’s acceptance speech sidestepped the deep concerns antiwar Democrats have about her hawkish foreign policy, which is already taking shape in the shadows


  • Patriot says:

    PNAC Neocon Bob Kagan (and wife Victoria Nuland who got US into Ukraine mess) advising Hillary:


  • Patriot says:

    According to a Forbes article, Clinton’s top donor is an Israeli-American named Haim Saban.

    According to Saban’s Wikipedia page: “Saban says his greatest concern is to protect Israel. At a conference in Israel, Saban described his formula. His three ways to influence American politics were: make donations to political parties, establish think tanks, and control media outlets.” He has stated in multiple interviews: “I’m a one-issue guy, and my issue is Israel.”

    Also from the Forbes article:


    “In March, she [Clinton] gave a speech at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee saying, “If I’m fortunate enough to be elected president, the United States will reaffirm we have a strong and enduring national interest in Israel’s security.” Clinton also wrote a letter to Saban in July 2015 asking for the billionaire’s “recommendations on how leaders and communities across America can work together to counter BDS [Boycot, Divestment and Sanctions],” a movement aimed to pressure Israel into accommodating Palestine’s demands.”

Leave a Reply